Supreme Court refers the issue of admissibility of Parliamentary Standing Committee reports to Constitution Bench: Kalpana Mehta vs. Union of India (2017)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 105, Constitutional Law with Article 145(3), Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Lok Sabha, Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Lok Sabha with Rule 270, Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Lok Sabha with Rule 274, Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business of Lok Sabha with Rule 277

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a court can rely on the report of a Parliamentary Standing Committee in a writ petition. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Kalpana Mehta and Others vs. Union of India and Others [Judgment Date]: April 5, 2017 Date of the Judgment: April 5, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dipak Misra, J., […]

Supreme Court refers the issue of admissibility of Parliamentary Standing Committee reports to Constitution Bench: Kalpana Mehta vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »