Supreme Court Clarifies Insider Trading Definition in Satyam Scam Case LEGAL ISSUE: Definition of “Insider” under the SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 1992. CASE TYPE: Securities Law/Insider Trading Case Name: Chintalapati Srinivasa Raju v. Securities and Exchange Board of India Judgment Date: 14 May 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 May 2018 Citation: […]
Supreme Court on Synchronized Trading and Market Manipulation in Derivatives LEGAL ISSUE: Whether synchronized and reversed trades in the derivatives market constitute fraudulent and unfair trade practices. CASE TYPE: Securities Law Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. Rakhi Trading Private Ltd. Judgment Date: 8 February 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 8
Supreme Court clarifies fraudulent trading in derivatives: SEBI vs. Rakhi Trading (2018) Read Post »
Date of the Judgment: September 20, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 763 Judges: N. V. Ramana, J., Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can individuals who are not intermediaries be held liable for front-running in the securities market? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question in a batch of appeals, clarifying the scope of the Securities and
LEGAL ISSUE: Determining the correct court for trying offenses under the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (SEBI Act). CASE TYPE: Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction Case Name: Securities and Exchange Board of India vs. Classic Credit Ltd. Introduction Date of the Judgment: 21 August 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 729 Judges: Jagdish Singh Khehar, CJI,
