Appointment

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Sub-Inspectors Despite Merit List Discrepancies: Pankjeshwar Sharma vs. State of J&K (2020)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Merit List, Recruitment Rules, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Sub-Inspectors Despite Merit List Discrepancies: Pankjeshwar Sharma vs. State of J&K (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether appointments made based on a concession by the Advocate General, deviating from the merit list, are valid. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Recruitment Case Name: Pankjeshwar Sharma and Others vs. State of Jammu & Kashmir and Others […]

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Sub-Inspectors Despite Merit List Discrepancies: Pankjeshwar Sharma vs. State of J&K (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Sub-Inspector Appointments: Nirbhay Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2020)

/ Appointment, Ashok Bhushan, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Judges, M.R. Shah, Selection Process, Service Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Sub-Inspector Appointments: Nirbhay Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates who did not participate in or failed the physical test for Sub-Inspector appointments can claim parity with those exempted from the test. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Nirbhay Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Bihar &

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Sub-Inspector Appointments: Nirbhay Kumar vs. State of Bihar (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Requirement for Polytechnic Principals: Gelus Ram Sahu vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh (2020)

/ All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987, All India Council for Technical Education Act, 1987 with 2010 AICTE Regulations, Appointment, B.R. Gavai, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 16, Constitution of India with Article 309, Judges, Qualifications, Regulations, Retrospective Application of Law, S.A. Bobde, Service Law, Surya Kant

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Requirement for Polytechnic Principals: Gelus Ram Sahu vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Ph.D. degree is mandatory for appointment to the post of Principal in Polytechnic colleges. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Gelus Ram Sahu and others vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh and others Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Clarifies Ph.D. Requirement for Polytechnic Principals: Gelus Ram Sahu vs. Dr. Surendra Kumar Singh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Provisional Employee: Kamlesh vs. Union of India (20 January 2020)

/ Appointment, Deepak Gupta, Judges, Regularization, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law, Termination of Service

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Provisional Employee: Kamlesh vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a provisionally appointed employee can claim regularization of services due to prolonged service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Kamlesh vs. Union of India Through Secretary Department of Post & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2020 Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Provisional Employee: Kamlesh vs. Union of India (20 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies: Select List Exhausted After Appointment in Service Matters: Union of India vs. G Ramesh (2020)

/ Appointment, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Exhaustion of Select List, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Select List, Service Law

Supreme Court on Exhaustion of Select List after Appointment: Union of India vs. G Ramesh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a select list for a government job remains valid after a candidate from that list is appointed and subsequently dismissed. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India & Ors vs. G Ramesh. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court clarifies: Select List Exhausted After Appointment in Service Matters: Union of India vs. G Ramesh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Junior Accounts Clerk: Rana Pratap Singh vs. Vittiye Evam Lekha Adhikari (2019)

/ Appointment, Ashok Bhushan, Interim Orders, Judges, Navin Sinha, Reinstatement, Service Law, Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985, Subordinate Offices Ministerial Staff (Direct Recruitment) Rules, 1985 with Rule 22

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Junior Accounts Clerk: Rana Pratap Singh vs. Vittiye Evam Lekha Adhikari (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment made by a duly constituted selection committee after calling names from the Employment Exchange can be deemed invalid due to procedural irregularities, and what is the effect of dismissal of a writ petition

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Junior Accounts Clerk: Rana Pratap Singh vs. Vittiye Evam Lekha Adhikari (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Teacher Under Rehbar-e-Taleem Scheme: Meena Sharma vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Appointment, Delay in Challenge, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Eligibility Criteria, Judges, Regularization, Rehbar-e-Taleem Scheme, Service Law, Village Level Committee

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Teacher Under Rehbar-e-Taleem Scheme: Meena Sharma vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment made under the Rehbar-e-Taleem (RET) Scheme can be challenged after a significant delay, especially when the appointee has been regularized and the initial selection process involved a combined list for two adjacent

Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Teacher Under Rehbar-e-Taleem Scheme: Meena Sharma vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019)

/ Appointment, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 341, Constitutional Law with Article 342, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah, Recruitment, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019) Date of the Judgment: May 7, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 463 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a person belonging to a Scheduled Tribe in one state claim reservation benefits in a

Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Empaneled Candidates: KSRTC vs. Akhilesh V.S. (2019)

/ Appointment, Arun Mishra, Judges, Navin Sinha, Rank List, Service Law, Service Law with Employer's Discretion

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Empaneled Candidates: KSRTC vs. Akhilesh V.S. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether mere empanelment in a rank list creates an indefeasible right to appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Kerala State Road Transport Corporation and Another vs. Akhilesh V.S. and Others Judgment Date: April 1, 2019 Date of the Judgment: April

Supreme Court Clarifies Rights of Empaneled Candidates: KSRTC vs. Akhilesh V.S. (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Junior Linemen, Sets Aside High Court Order: K. Amarnath Reddy vs. A.P.S.P.D.C.L. (25 February 2019)

/ Appointment, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Regularization, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Law with Condition No. 6 (iv) (c) of the revised notification dated 20.10.2006

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Junior Linemen, Sets Aside High Court Order: K. Amarnath Reddy vs. A.P.S.P.D.C.L. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of appointments to the posts of Junior Linemen in Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation and Distribution Companies. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: K. Amarnath Reddy & Ors. vs. Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L. &

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Junior Linemen, Sets Aside High Court Order: K. Amarnath Reddy vs. A.P.S.P.D.C.L. (25 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments Despite Late Result Declaration: Rakesh Bakshi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019)

/ Appointment, Ashok Bhushan, Eligibility Criteria, Judges, Judicial Review, K.M. Joseph, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments Despite Late Result Declaration: Rakesh Bakshi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates who obtain their qualifying degree after the cut-off date for applications can be considered eligible for appointment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Rakesh Bakshi & Anr. vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir &

Supreme Court Upholds Appointments Despite Late Result Declaration: Rakesh Bakshi vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Appointment Rights Based on Cancelled 1999 Lineman Selection: State of Manipur vs. Takhelmayum Khelendro Meitei (2019)

/ Appointment, Cancellation of Selection, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, R. Subhash Reddy, Recruitment, S.A. Bobde, Service Law

Supreme Court Denies Appointment Rights Based on Cancelled 1999 Lineman Selection: State of Manipur vs. Takhelmayum Khelendro Meitei (2019) Date of the Judgment: January 17, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 34 Judges: S.A. Bobde, J., L. Nageswara Rao, J., R. Subhash Reddy, J. Can a candidate claim a right to appointment based on a selection process

Supreme Court Denies Appointment Rights Based on Cancelled 1999 Lineman Selection: State of Manipur vs. Takhelmayum Khelendro Meitei (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top