Assured Career Progression (ACP)

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression (ACP) eligibility: Amresh Kumar Sinha & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (25 April 2023)

/ Assured Career Progression (ACP), B.R. Gavai, Bihar Accounts Service Rules, 2000, Bihar Accounts Service Rules, 2000 with Rule 17, Bihar Accounts Service Rules, 2000 with Rule 20, Bihar State Employees Service Condition (Assured Career Progression Scheme) Rules, 2003, Bihar State Employees Service Condition (Assured Career Progression Scheme) Rules, 2003 with Rule 4(5), Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Promotion, Service Law, Stagnation

Supreme Court Clarifies Assured Career Progression (ACP) Eligibility: Amresh Kumar Sinha & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the qualification of graduation, prescribed for promotion to the post of Accounts Officer, is also necessary for granting the benefit of Assured Career Progression (ACP). CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Amresh […]

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression (ACP) eligibility: Amresh Kumar Sinha & Ors. vs. State of Bihar & Ors. (25 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pay Parity to Junior Stenographers: Anjali Arora vs. Union of India (2019)

/ Assured Career Progression (ACP), Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, National Institute Regulations, National Institute Regulations with Regulation 4(2), Navin Sinha, Pay Parity, R.F. Nariman, Service Law

Supreme Court Denies Pay Parity to Junior Stenographers: Anjali Arora vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether junior stenographers are entitled to pay parity with senior stenographers based on the principle of “equal pay for equal work” and Regulation 4(2) of the National Institute Regulations. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Writ Petition (Civil) Case

Supreme Court Denies Pay Parity to Junior Stenographers: Anjali Arora vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top