Assured Career Progression Scheme

Supreme Court Upholds Stepping Up of Pay for Seniors: Union of India vs. C.R. Madhava Murthy (2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, B.V. Nagarathna, Fundamental Rules, Fundamental Rules with Rule 22, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pay Anomaly, Service Law, Service Law with FR 22

Supreme Court Upholds Stepping Up of Pay for Seniors: Union of India vs. C.R. Madhava Murthy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether senior employees are entitled to a stepping up of pay to match their juniors’ pay when the juniors receive higher pay due to an Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme upgradation, despite the seniors having already […]

Supreme Court Upholds Stepping Up of Pay for Seniors: Union of India vs. C.R. Madhava Murthy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles applicability of ACP vs MACP Scheme for Central Government Employees: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. (24 March 2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, B.R. Gavai, Central Government Employees, Financial Upgradation, Government Schemes, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, Service Law, Service Law with Office Memorandum dated 9th August, 1999

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of ACP and MACP schemes for government employees LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme or Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 March 2022 Introduction Date

Supreme Court settles applicability of ACP vs MACP Scheme for Central Government Employees: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. (24 March 2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation upon refusal of promotion in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, O.M. dated 18.7.2001, O.M. dated 9.8.1999, Office Memorandum, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme: Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who refuses a promotion is entitled to financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 03 January 2022

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation upon refusal of promotion in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation in service matters (2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme for Central Government Employees LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who refuse promotions are eligible for financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 3 January 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation in service matters (2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for employees refusing promotions in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022)

/ Approbate and Reprobate, Assured Career Progression Scheme, Doctrine, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Office Memorandum, Office Memorandum with 18.7.2001, Office Memorandum with 9.8.1999, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme: Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who refuse promotions are eligible for financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 3 January 2022 Introduction

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for employees refusing promotions in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles ACP Scheme applicability for retained employees in Haryana State Small Industries Case (24 April 2017)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, Court Orders, Judges, Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi, Service Law

Can employees, retained by court order, be considered surplus and denied benefits under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving the Haryana State Small Industries and Export Corporation Limited. This judgment clarifies the position of employees retained due to court orders, ensuring they

Supreme Court settles ACP Scheme applicability for retained employees in Haryana State Small Industries Case (24 April 2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top