Central Administrative Tribunal

Supreme Court allows pensionary benefits for contractual service period: S.D. Jayaprakash vs. Union of India (2025)

/ Central Administrative Tribunal, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Contractual Employment, High Court, Joymalya Bagchi, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Pensionary Benefits, Rule 17, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: April 29, 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 594 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J., Joymalya Bagchi, J. Can prior contractual service be counted towards pensionary benefits upon regularization? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in the case of S.D. Jayaprakash vs. Union of India. The court partly allowed the appeals, directing the Union […]

Supreme Court allows pensionary benefits for contractual service period: S.D. Jayaprakash vs. Union of India (2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Central Administrative Tribunal, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, Pay Scales, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (2023) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8329 of 2011 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Rastogi and Hon’ble Ms. Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can the judiciary interfere

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Disparity Between Junior Design Officers and Civilian Technical Officers: Union of India vs. Indian Navy Civilian Design Officers Association (22 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Pension and Terminal Benefits Based on CAT Orders for Merged Language Cadre: R.D. Kaushal vs Union of India (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Central Administrative Tribunal, Central Administrative Tribunal with orders of 26th May 2008, Central Administrative Tribunal with orders of 7th July 2010, Judges, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Pension, Service Law, Service Law with Research and Analysis Wing (Recruitment, Cadre and Service) Rules, 1975, Terminal Benefits

Supreme Court Orders Pension and Terminal Benefits Based on CAT Orders for Merged Language Cadre: R.D. Kaushal vs Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the merger of two cadres should impact the terminal benefits and pension of employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: R.D. Kaushal and Ors. vs. Union of India and Ors.

Supreme Court Orders Pension and Terminal Benefits Based on CAT Orders for Merged Language Cadre: R.D. Kaushal vs Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Judicial Member’s Extension: Union of India vs. Navneet Kumar (2022)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 with Section 6(3), Administrative Tribunals (Procedure for Appointment of Members) Rules, 2011, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, B.R. Gavai, Central Administrative Tribunal, Extension of Service, Judges, Judicial Appointments, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Judicial Member’s Extension: Union of India vs. Navneet Kumar (2022) Date of the Judgment: May 5, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 422 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and B.R. Gavai, J. Can a competent authority reject a recommendation for extension of term of a Judicial Member of the Central Administrative Tribunal,

Supreme Court Upholds Rejection of Judicial Member’s Extension: Union of India vs. Navneet Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Jurisdiction of High Court in Transfer of Cases: Supreme Court clarifies in Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) INSC 1 (06 January 2022)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Administrative Law, Administrative Law with Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, C.T. Ravikumar, Central Administrative Tribunal, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Fundamental Rights, Judges

Jurisdiction of High Court in Transfer of Cases: Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) INSC 1 Date of the Judgment: 06 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1 Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can the High Court exercise power of judicial review over an order of transfer of an Original Application by the

Jurisdiction of High Court in Transfer of Cases: Supreme Court clarifies in Union of India vs. Alapan Bandyopadhyay (2022) INSC 1 (06 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Authority: AIIMS vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (2019)

/ Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 24, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 25, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 with Section 5, Central Administrative Tribunal, Indira Banerjee, Interim Orders, Judges, R. Banumathi, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Authority: AIIMS vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Chairman of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), sitting singly, can stay proceedings before a Division Bench of the same Tribunal. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: All India Institute of Medical Sciences vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 1

Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Authority: AIIMS vs. Sanjiv Chaturvedi (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order regarding regularization of Khalasis: Union of India vs. Laxman Singh Champalal (01 September 2008)

/ Administrative Law, Central Administrative Tribunal, Cyriac Joseph, Judges, Judicial Review, Reasoned Judgments, Regularization, Reversion, S.B. Sinha, Service Law, Tribunal Orders

Date of the Judgment: 01 September 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha and Cyriac Joseph, JJ. Can a High Court judgment be sustained if it lacks reasoning? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case concerning the regularization of employees in the post of Khalasis. The Court emphasized the necessity for the High Court to provide

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order regarding regularization of Khalasis: Union of India vs. Laxman Singh Champalal (01 September 2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top