Consequential Benefits

Supreme Court Orders Retrospective Promotion with Benefits: K. Samba Moorthy vs. Sanjiv Chadha (2025) INSC 110

Date of the Judgment: 27th January 2025 Citation: 2025 INSC 110 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., K.V. Viswanathan, J. Can an employee be denied promotion and its benefits due to a flawed disciplinary process? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case. The Court ruled in favor of an employee who was […]

Supreme Court Orders Retrospective Promotion with Benefits: K. Samba Moorthy vs. Sanjiv Chadha (2025) INSC 110 Read Post »

Supreme Court Limits Back Pay in JNV University Regularization Case: Jai Narain Vyas University vs. Mukesh Sharma (28 March 2022)

Supreme Court Limits Back Pay in JNV University Regularization Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, who have worked for 15-30 years on a contractual basis, are entitled to full back pay upon regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur and Anr. vs. Mukesh Sharma Etc.

Supreme Court Limits Back Pay in JNV University Regularization Case: Jai Narain Vyas University vs. Mukesh Sharma (28 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court modifies retirement benefits for teacher denied appointment: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Ali Hussain Ansari (2020)

Supreme Court modifies retirement benefits for teacher denied appointment: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Ali Hussain Ansari (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a teacher who was initially recommended for appointment but not actually appointed and later appointed after a long gap, is entitled to back wages and consequential benefits from the date of initial recommendation. CASE

Supreme Court modifies retirement benefits for teacher denied appointment: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Ali Hussain Ansari (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Selection Board’s Decision in Army Promotion Case: Union of India vs. Col Ran Singh Dudee (2018) INSC 567 (3 July 2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Selection Board’s Decision in Army Promotion Case Date of the Judgment: 3 July 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 567 Judges: Adarsh Kumar Goel, J., Uday Umesh Lalit, J. Can “consequential benefits” following the quashing of a General Court Martial include automatic promotion to a higher rank? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Selection Board’s Decision in Army Promotion Case: Union of India vs. Col Ran Singh Dudee (2018) INSC 567 (3 July 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top