Contract Employees

Supreme Court clarifies regularization of contract employees: University of Delhi vs. Delhi University Contract Employees Union (2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Contract Employees, Fundamental Rights, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Recruitment Process, Regularization, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies regularization of contract employees: University of Delhi vs. Delhi University Contract Employees Union (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contract employees are entitled to regularization and what criteria should be used for their selection process. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: University of Delhi vs. Delhi University Contract Employees Union & Ors. Judgment Date: […]

Supreme Court clarifies regularization of contract employees: University of Delhi vs. Delhi University Contract Employees Union (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on contract employee reinstatement: APSRTC vs. M. Maruthi (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Employees, Departmental Enquiry, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Reinstatement, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on contract employee reinstatement: APSRTC vs. M. Maruthi (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contract employee, dismissed after a departmental inquiry, is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service based on a previous judgment concerning employees terminated without inquiry. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Depot Manager, APSRTC vs.

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on contract employee reinstatement: APSRTC vs. M. Maruthi (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees: APSRTC vs. B. Venkataiah (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Employees, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M.R. Shah, Regularization, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees: APSRTC vs. B. Venkataiah (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of their initial termination until their re-engagement for the purpose of regularization, even if the termination was not challenged. CASE

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees: APSRTC vs. B. Venkataiah (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees in APSRTC vs. A. Sanjeev Reddy (2018)

/ Contract Employees, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Judges, M.R. Shah, Regularization, Service Law, Termination of Service

Supreme Court on Continuity of Service for Re-engaged Contract Employees: APSRTC vs. A. Sanjeev Reddy (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of termination until the date of re-engagement for regularization purposes. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: APSRTC & Ors. vs. Sri A. Sanjeev

Supreme Court clarifies continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees in APSRTC vs. A. Sanjeev Reddy (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for contract employees after misconduct: The Depot Manager vs. Sri R.K. Reddy (2018)

/ Continuity of Service, Contract Employees, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Industrial Dispute, Judges, Labour Court, Labour Law, M.R. Shah, Service Law, Termination of Service

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for contract employees after misconduct: The Depot Manager vs. Sri R.K. Reddy (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contract employee, terminated for misconduct after a departmental inquiry, is entitled to continuity of service upon re-engagement. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Labour Law. Case Name: The Depot Manager

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for contract employees after misconduct: The Depot Manager vs. Sri R.K. Reddy (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the inclusion of contract employees in Indian Broadcasting Service: Union of India vs. E. Krishna Rao (2018)

/ Contract Employees, Departmental Candidates, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service Rules, 1990, Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service Rules, 1990 with Note 3 of Schedule I, Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service Rules, 1990 with Rule 2(c), Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service Rules, 1990 with Rule 6, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Regular Service, Service Law

Supreme Court settles the inclusion of contract employees in Indian Broadcasting Service: Union of India vs. E. Krishna Rao (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether contract employees of Doordarshan, later declared government servants, are entitled to be included in the Indian Broadcasting (Programme) Service and receive associated benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India

Supreme Court settles the inclusion of contract employees in Indian Broadcasting Service: Union of India vs. E. Krishna Rao (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top