Disciplinary Proceedings

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Bank Employee’s Fraud and Misconduct: Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022)

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Dismissal of Employee, Evidence Act, 1872, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Section 45, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73, Evidence Act, 1872, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Bank Employee’s Fraud and Misconduct: Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bank employee’s dismissal for fraud and misconduct was justified. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings. Case Name: Indian Overseas Bank & Ors. vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava. [Judgment Date]: 19 January 2022 Date […]

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Bank Employee’s Fraud and Misconduct: Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Dismissal of Employee for Fraud and Forgery: Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022)

/ Banking Law, Constitution of India, Constitution of India with Article 226, Disciplinary Proceedings, Forgery, Fraud, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 45, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 47, Indian Evidence Act, 1872 with Section 73, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Dismissal of Employee for Fraud and Forgery: Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022) Date of the Judgment: January 19, 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 49 Judges: Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a bank employee be dismissed for forging signatures and misappropriating funds, even if a

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Dismissal of Employee for Fraud and Forgery: Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Dismissal of Employee for Fraud and Forgery in Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022)

/ Bank Employees, Disciplinary Proceedings, Evidence Act, Evidence Act with Section 73, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Dismissal of Employee for Fraud and Forgery in Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bank employee can be dismissed for misconduct, including fraud and forgery, based on a preponderance of evidence in departmental proceedings, and whether the High Court can interfere with the Industrial

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Dismissal of Employee for Fraud and Forgery in Indian Overseas Bank vs. Om Prakash Lal Srivastava (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Representation by Ex-Employees in Disciplinary Proceedings: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena (2022) INSC 1

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M. R. Shah, Right to Representation, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Law with Regulation 44

Supreme Court Restricts Representation by Ex-Employees in Disciplinary Proceedings: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena (2022) INSC 1 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee facing disciplinary proceedings has the right to be represented by a former employee of the same organization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) &

Supreme Court Restricts Representation by Ex-Employees in Disciplinary Proceedings: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena (2022) INSC 1 Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns reinstatement order in MSRTC driver dismissal case: Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Dilip Uttam Jayabhay (2022) INSC 5 (03 January 2022)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, Criminal Law, Criminal Law with Section 279, Disciplinary Proceedings, Dismissal from Service, Industrial Disputes, Judges, Labour Law, M. R. Shah, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 with Section 1(g), Schedule IV, Reinstatement, Service Law, Unfair Labour Practices

Supreme Court overturns reinstatement order in MSRTC driver dismissal case Date of the Judgment: 03 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 5 Judges: M. R. Shah, J. and B. V. Nagarathna, J. Can an Industrial Court interfere with a disciplinary authority’s decision to dismiss an employee, especially when the employee’s misconduct led to a fatal accident?

Supreme Court overturns reinstatement order in MSRTC driver dismissal case: Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation vs. Dilip Uttam Jayabhay (2022) INSC 5 (03 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 14

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings can be validated by ex-post facto approval from the disciplinary authority. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India & Anr.

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Bar Councils to Expedite Disciplinary Proceedings: K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy (2021)

/ Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 36B, B.V. Nagarathna, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M.R. Shah, Professional Misconduct

Supreme Court Directs Bar Councils to Expedite Disciplinary Proceedings: K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy (2021) Date of the Judgment: December 17, 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 7478 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. What happens when complaints against lawyers for misconduct languish for years without resolution? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court Directs Bar Councils to Expedite Disciplinary Proceedings: K. Anjinappa vs. K.C. Krishna Reddy (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Railway Protection Force Case: Union of India vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav (26 November 2021)

/ Constitutional Law, Disciplinary Proceedings, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Natural Justice, R. Subhash Reddy, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Rule 161, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Railway Protection Force Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disciplinary proceedings can be initiated without a formal inquiry under Rule 161 of the Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav Judgment Date: 26 November 2021 Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Appeal in Railway Protection Force Case: Union of India vs. Ram Bahadur Yadav (26 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Recovery Order Against Employee in Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Case (23 November 2021)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Disciplinary Authority, Disciplinary Proceedings, Enquiry Officer, Judges, M.R. Shah, Natural Justice, Principles of Natural Justice, Recovery of Losses, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Partial Recovery of Loss in Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Case Date of the Judgment: 23 November 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6947 of 2021 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a disciplinary authority impose a punishment based on charges not proven by the Enquiry Officer? The Supreme Court recently

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Recovery Order Against Employee in Uttar Pradesh Forest Corporation Case (23 November 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Misconduct Case: State Bank of India vs. M.J. James (2021)

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 36, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Law with Service Code

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Misconduct Case: State Bank of India vs. M.J. James (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can be represented by a union of any bank or only the bank where he was employed during disciplinary proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: The Chairman, State Bank of India &

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Misconduct Case: State Bank of India vs. M.J. James (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council Decision in Disciplinary Matter: Ramesh Chand Goyal vs. Balbir Singh Chakkal (2021)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Ajay Rastogi, Appellate Jurisdiction, Bar Council of India, Bar Council of India with Disciplinary Committee, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council Decision in Disciplinary Matter: Ramesh Chand Goyal vs. Balbir Singh Chakkal (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Review of a disciplinary order by the Bar Council of India. CASE TYPE: Disciplinary Matter Case Name: Ramesh Chand Goyal vs. Balbir Singh Chakkal [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2021 Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2021

Supreme Court Upholds Bar Council Decision in Disciplinary Matter: Ramesh Chand Goyal vs. Balbir Singh Chakkal (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Sealed Cover Procedure for Promotions: State Bank of India vs. C.K. Karunakaran (30 September 2021)

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Law with Minor Penalties, Service Law with Sealed Cover Procedure

Supreme Court Upholds Sealed Cover Procedure for Promotions: State Bank of India vs. C.K. Karunakaran (2021) Date of the Judgment: 30 September 2021 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6821 of 2009 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Hon’ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh Can a bank withhold a promotion if disciplinary proceedings were initiated against

Supreme Court Upholds Sealed Cover Procedure for Promotions: State Bank of India vs. C.K. Karunakaran (30 September 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top