Financial Upgradation

Supreme Court settles applicability of ACP vs MACP Scheme for Central Government Employees: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. (24 March 2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, B.R. Gavai, Central Government Employees, Financial Upgradation, Government Schemes, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, Service Law, Service Law with Office Memorandum dated 9th August, 1999

Supreme Court clarifies applicability of ACP and MACP schemes for government employees LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme or Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. Judgment Date: 24 March 2022 Introduction Date […]

Supreme Court settles applicability of ACP vs MACP Scheme for Central Government Employees: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ranjit Samuel & Ors. (24 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme: Directorate of Enforcement vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar (28 January 2022)

/ Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008, Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 with Section 1, Part A of the First Schedule, Financial Upgradation, Judges, M. R. Shah, Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme, Pension, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme: Directorate of Enforcement vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme regarding grade pay upon financial upgradation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Director, Directorate of Enforcement & Anr. vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar & Ors. Judgment Date: 28

Supreme Court clarifies Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme: Directorate of Enforcement vs. K. Sudheesh Kumar (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation upon refusal of promotion in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, O.M. dated 18.7.2001, O.M. dated 9.8.1999, Office Memorandum, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme: Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who refuses a promotion is entitled to financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 03 January 2022

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation upon refusal of promotion in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation in service matters (2022)

/ Assured Career Progression Scheme, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme for Central Government Employees LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who refuse promotions are eligible for financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 3 January 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for financial upgradation in service matters (2022) Read Post »

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for employees refusing promotions in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022)

/ Approbate and Reprobate, Assured Career Progression Scheme, Doctrine, Financial Upgradation, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Office Memorandum, Office Memorandum with 18.7.2001, Office Memorandum with 9.8.1999, Promotion, R. Subhash Reddy, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies Assured Career Progression Scheme: Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who refuse promotions are eligible for financial upgradation under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) Scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Manju Arora & Anr. Judgment Date: 3 January 2022 Introduction

Assured Career Progression Scheme: Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for employees refusing promotions in Union of India vs. Manju Arora (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Review of Financial Upgrade and Promotion for CSIR Employee: Anil Kumar vs. Union of India (2019)

/ Annual Confidential Reports (ACR), Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, Financial Upgradation, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Natural Justice, Promotion, Service Law

Supreme Court Orders Review of Financial Upgrade and Promotion for CSIR Employee: Anil Kumar vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether non-communication of Annual Confidential Reports (ACRs) to an employee affects their right to financial upgradation and promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Anil Kumar vs. Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court Orders Review of Financial Upgrade and Promotion for CSIR Employee: Anil Kumar vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top