Government Employees

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe (2023) INSC 388

/ Factories Act, 1948, Factories Act, 1948 with Section 2(l), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 59(1), Factories Act, 1948 with Section 64(1), Government Employees, Judges, Overtime Allowance, Pankaj Mithal, Service Law, Service Rules, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units Date of the Judgment: April 18, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 388 Judges: V. Ramasubramanian, J., Pankaj Mithal, J. The Supreme Court of India addressed whether supervisors in government-owned printing and minting facilities are entitled to double overtime pay under the Factories Act, 1948. This […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Overtime Entitlement for Supervisors in Government Printing Units: Security Printing & Minting Corporation of India Ltd. vs. Vijay D. Kasbe (2023) INSC 388 Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Bihar Government in Contempt for Non-Compliance with Pension Orders: Bijay Kumar Sinha vs. Tripurari Sharan (2022) INSC 49 (18 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Contempt of Court, Employee Benefits, Government Employees, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Pension Benefits, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Holds Bihar Government in Contempt for Non-Compliance with Pension Orders Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 49 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao J., B.R. Gavai J. Can a state government repeatedly ignore court orders regarding employee benefits? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, initiating contempt proceedings against

Supreme Court Holds Bihar Government in Contempt for Non-Compliance with Pension Orders: Bijay Kumar Sinha vs. Tripurari Sharan (2022) INSC 49 (18 January 2022) Read Post »

Study Leave During Pandemic: Supreme Court directs reconsideration of denial of study leave: Dr. Rohit Kumar vs. Secretary Office of Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors. (15 July 2021)

/ Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972 with Rule 50, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Government Employees, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Public Interest, Service Law, Study Leave, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Directs Reconsideration of Study Leave for Doctor Amidst COVID-19: Dr. Rohit Kumar vs. Secretary Office of Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors. (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government doctor can be denied study leave during a pandemic. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Dr. Rohit Kumar vs. Secretary Office of Lt. Governor of

Study Leave During Pandemic: Supreme Court directs reconsideration of denial of study leave: Dr. Rohit Kumar vs. Secretary Office of Lt. Governor of Delhi & Ors. (15 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Revised Pay Scale: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Vijay Shankar Dubey (2020)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Cut-off Date, Government Employees, Government Order dated 02.02.2007, Government Orders, Judges, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Pay Scale, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Revised Pay Scale: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Vijay Shankar Dubey (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a cut-off date fixed by the government for implementing revised pay scales can be challenged when the revision is based on an analogy with another organization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Revised Pay Scale: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Vijay Shankar Dubey (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefits for Project Employees: Parmeshwar Nanda vs. State of Jharkhand (2020)

/ Government Employees, Hemant Gupta, Jharkhand Pension Rules, Jharkhand Pension Rules with Rule 58, Jharkhand Pension Rules with Rule 59, Jharkhand Pension Rules with Rule 60, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Pension, Service Law

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefits for Project Employees: Parmeshwar Nanda vs. State of Jharkhand (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether past services rendered under a Central Government co-sponsored project can be counted for pensionary benefits after subsequent absorption into state government service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Parmeshwar Nanda ETC. vs. The State of Jharkhand Through

Supreme Court Denies Pension Benefits for Project Employees: Parmeshwar Nanda vs. State of Jharkhand (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Scales for Tamil Nadu Drivers: P. Singaravelan vs. The District Collector, Tiruppur (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Government Employees, Judges, Krishna Murari, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Pay Scales, Service Law, Tamil Nadu

Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Scales for Tamil Nadu Drivers: P. Singaravelan vs. The District Collector, Tiruppur (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of pay scale rules for government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: P. Singaravelan & Ors. Etc. Etc. vs. The District Collector, Tiruppur and DT & Ors. Etc. Etc. Judgment Date: 18 December 2019

Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Scales for Tamil Nadu Drivers: P. Singaravelan vs. The District Collector, Tiruppur (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Review of Tamil Nadu Pay Scales: Tamil Nadu Rural Development Engineers vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (28 November 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, D. Murugesan, Government Employees, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Natural Justice, Pay Scales, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Review of Tamil Nadu Pay Scales: Tamil Nadu Rural Development Engineers vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the State Government can reduce the pay scales of its employees after initially granting them higher pay based on the recommendations of a pay commission. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Directs Fresh Review of Tamil Nadu Pay Scales: Tamil Nadu Rural Development Engineers vs. Government of Tamil Nadu (28 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings Against E K Narayanan (16 May 2018)

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Government Employees, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Pension, Service Law

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings Against E K Narayanan (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Disciplinary proceedings and penalties imposed on a government employee. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: E K Narayanan vs. Union of India & Ors. Judgment Date: 16 May 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 16 May 2018 Citation: Not Available

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Disciplinary Proceedings Against E K Narayanan (16 May 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension benefits for employees of reorganized states: Shakti Prasad Bhatt vs. State of Uttarakhand (26 April 2018)

/ Arun Mishra, Government Employees, Implications on Service Law, Judges, Pension Benefits, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit, Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000

Supreme Court Rules Past Services Count for Pension Benefits in Reorganized States LEGAL ISSUE: Whether past services of employees in a bifurcated state should be counted for pension and other benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Shakti Prasad Bhatt ETC. ETC. vs. The State of Uttarakhand AND ORS. ETC. Judgment Date: 26 April 2018

Supreme Court settles pension benefits for employees of reorganized states: Shakti Prasad Bhatt vs. State of Uttarakhand (26 April 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top