Supreme Court quashes penalty for lack of evidence in disciplinary proceedings: Satyendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Disciplinary Proceedings, Major Penalty, Natural Justice, Service Law, Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999, Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 with Rule 37, Uttar Pradesh Government Servant (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1999 with Rule 7

Supreme Court quashes penalty for lack of evidence in disciplinary proceedings: Satyendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) Date of the Judgment: 18 November 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 873 Judges: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a disciplinary authority impose a major penalty on a government servant without recording any oral […]

Supreme Court quashes penalty for lack of evidence in disciplinary proceedings: Satyendra Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2024) Read Post »