Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Double Promotion Benefits in Inter-University Transfers: Sasikala Devi vs. State of Kerala (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Inter-University Transfers, Judges, Kerala University First Statutes, Kerala University First Statutes with Statute No. 14A, Pay Protection, Promotion Benefits, Rajesh Bindal, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Double Promotion Benefits in Inter-University Transfers: Sasikala Devi vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees transferred between universities are entitled to a second pay upgrade upon promotion in the new university, despite having their previous pay protected. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Smt. Sasikala Devi vs. The […]

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Double Promotion Benefits in Inter-University Transfers: Sasikala Devi vs. State of Kerala (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Double Promotion Benefits in Inter-University Transfers: Sasikala Devi vs. State of Kerala (28 April 2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Inter-University Transfers, Judges, Kerala University First Statutes, Kerala University First Statutes with Statute 14A, Pay Protection, Rajesh Bindal, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Double Promotion Benefits in Inter-University Transfers: Sasikala Devi vs. State of Kerala (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who transfer between universities are entitled to a second pay upgrade upon promotion in the new university, despite having their previous higher pay protected. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Smt. Sasikala Devi.

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Double Promotion Benefits in Inter-University Transfers: Sasikala Devi vs. State of Kerala (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pension calculation for work-charged employees in Bihar: Uday Pratap Thakur vs. State of Bihar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Pension Rules, Rule 5(v) of the Work Charged Establishment Revised Service Conditions (Repealing) Rules, 2013, Service Law, Work-Charged Employees

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Calculation for Work-Charged Employees in Bihar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Calculation of pension benefits for work-charged employees upon regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Uday Pratap Thakur and Anr. vs. The State of Bihar and Ors. [Judgment Date]: April 28, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 28, 2023 Citation: 2023

Supreme Court clarifies pension calculation for work-charged employees in Bihar: Uday Pratap Thakur vs. State of Bihar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court orders re-evaluation of answer keys in Sub Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Service Law, Service Law with Writ Petitions

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation in Jharkhand Sub-Inspector Exam Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in dismissing the writ petitions of candidates who raised objections to the answer keys after the stipulated time but before the declaration of results, and whether the High Court was correct in holding that no prejudice was caused

Supreme Court orders re-evaluation of answer keys in Sub Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh & Ors. vs. The State of Jharkhand & Ors. (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Sub-Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Examination Rules, Jharkhand Staff Selection Commission, Judges, M.R. Shah, Recruitment Examination, Service Law

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Sub-Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in dismissing the appeals of candidates who raised objections to the answer key of a competitive exam after the stipulated deadline but before the declaration of results. CASE TYPE: Service Law –

Supreme Court Orders Re-evaluation of Sub-Inspector Exam: Sachit Kumar Singh vs. State of Jharkhand (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Lien Termination in Government Service: State of Rajasthan vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 with Rule 18(2), Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Lien Termination in Government Service: State of Rajasthan vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government employee’s lien on their previous post is terminated upon permanent absorption into another organization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (Dead) by LRs

Supreme Court Clarifies Lien Termination in Government Service: State of Rajasthan vs. Dr. Hamir Singh Chouhan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Rights of Employees Absorbed into Rajasthan Dairy Federations (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Lien, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951 with Rule 18, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Rights of Employees Absorbed into Rajasthan Dairy Federations (28 April 2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who initially worked for the Rajasthan State Government but were later absorbed into the Rajasthan Cooperative Dairy Federations are entitled to pensionary benefits from the State Government. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Rajasthan

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Rights of Employees Absorbed into Rajasthan Dairy Federations (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited, M.R. Shah, Pay Revision, Service Law

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana: Supreme Court on Pay Revision Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2023 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2702 of 2023 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can employees who joined after a pay revision date be automatically entitled to the revised pay scale? The Supreme

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pay Revision, Performance Targets, Service Law, Service Law with D.O./order

Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana: Supreme Court on Pay Revision Date of the Judgment: 28 April 2023Citation: 2023 INSC 456Judges: Justice M.R. Shah and Justice C.T. Ravikumar Can employees who joined after a pay revision date be entitled to the benefits of that revision? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision for Assistant Executive Engineers: Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited vs. Sri. B. G. Manamohana (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies appointment process for teachers in minority institutions: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rachna Hills (27 April 2023)

/ Appointment Process, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Education Law, Judges, Minority Institutions, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Service Law, Teacher Appointments, Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921, Uttar Pradesh Intermediate Education Act, 1921 with Section 16-FF

Supreme Court Clarifies Teacher Appointment Process in Minority Institutions: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rachna Hills (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the selection process for teachers in minority institutions concludes before the mandatory approval of the District Inspector of Schools (DIOS). CASE TYPE: Education Law, Service Law Case Name: The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.

Supreme Court clarifies appointment process for teachers in minority institutions: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rachna Hills (27 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales Based on Qualifications: State of Gujarat vs. Dr. P.A. Bhatt (26 April 2023)

/ Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 174, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 176, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pankaj Mithal, Pay Scales, Service Law, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales Based on Qualifications: State of Gujarat vs. Dr. P.A. Bhatt (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether different pay scales can be fixed for officers of the same cadre based on their educational qualifications, and whether Allopathic and AYUSH doctors are entitled to equal pay. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State

Supreme Court Upholds Differential Pay Scales Based on Qualifications: State of Gujarat vs. Dr. P.A. Bhatt (26 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of RPF Recruit Despite Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: Union of India vs. Santosh Kumar Singh (26 April 2023)

/ Aravind Kumar, Discharge from Service, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Railway Protection Force Rules, 1987, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of RPF Recruit Despite Acquittal in Dowry Death Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Railway Protection Force (RPF) recruit can be discharged from service due to involvement in a criminal case, despite subsequent acquittal. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Santosh Kumar Singh. [Judgment Date]: 26

Supreme Court Upholds Discharge of RPF Recruit Despite Acquittal in Dowry Death Case: Union of India vs. Santosh Kumar Singh (26 April 2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top