Service Law

Premature Repatriation of Employee on Probation: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules in National Technical Research Organization vs. Dipti Deodhare (2023)

/ CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, Hima Kohli, Judges, Lien, M.R. Shah, Pension Rules, Pension Rules with Rule 13, Pension Rules with Rule 2, Probation, Service Law, Service Law with DOPT O.M. dated 21.07.2014

Premature Repatriation of Employee on Probation: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee on probation can be prematurely repatriated to their parent department and be treated as discharged simpliciter. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: National Technical Research Organization & Others vs. Dipti Deodhare Judgment Date: 17 February 2023 Date of the Judgment: […]

Premature Repatriation of Employee on Probation: Supreme Court Clarifies Rules in National Technical Research Organization vs. Dipti Deodhare (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Civil Procedure, Development Agreement, Judges, M. R. Shah, Property Dispute, Property Law, Sanjay Karol, Special Leave Petition, Withdrawal of Petition

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Special Leave Petition can be withdrawn unconditionally due to subsequent developments in a property dispute. CASE TYPE: Property Law. Case Name: S.M. Pasha & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February 17,

Supreme Court permits withdrawal of SLP in property dispute: S.M. Pasha vs. State of Maharashtra (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles gratuity eligibility for deceased employees: State of U.P. vs. Smt. Priyanka (2023)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Death-cum-Retirement Benefits, Gratuity, Judges, M.R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court rules on gratuity for deceased employee’s family: State of UP vs. Smt. Priyanka (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the family of a deceased employee is entitled to gratuity when the employee dies before opting for retirement at the age of 60 years. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: State of U.P. and Ors. vs.

Supreme Court settles gratuity eligibility for deceased employees: State of U.P. vs. Smt. Priyanka (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Regularization for Daily Wage Employee: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Daily Wage Employees, Judges, Regularization, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Regularization for Daily Wage Employee: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a daily wage employee is entitled to regularization without a sanctioned post and appointment by a competent authority. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Regularization for Daily Wage Employee: Vibhuti Shankar Pandey vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Challenge to GAIL’s Transportation Charges: GAIL vs. IPCL (2023)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Contract Law, Contract Law with Clause 4.04, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Public Sector Undertakings, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Unequal Bargaining Power

Supreme Court Upholds Challenge to GAIL’s Transportation Charges: GAIL vs. IPCL (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Public Sector Undertaking can levy transportation charges on another entity when that entity is mandated to use its own infrastructure for gas transportation. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case Name: M/S. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED vs. M/S. INDIAN PETROCHEMICALS

Supreme Court Upholds Challenge to GAIL’s Transportation Charges: GAIL vs. IPCL (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Verification of Madrasa Teacher Appointments: Snehasis Giri vs. Subhasis Mitra (2 February 2023)

/ Appointment of Teachers, Civil Contempt, Contempt of Court, Dipankar Datta, Educational Institutions, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Scope of Contempt Jurisdiction, Service Law, Verification of Appointments, West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008, West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008 with Section 10, West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008 with Section 12, West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008 with Section 8

Supreme Court Directs Verification of Madrasa Teacher Appointments: Snehasis Giri vs. Subhasis Mitra (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether appointments made by Madrasas during the pendency of appeals, after the High Court declared certain provisions of the West Bengal Madrasa Service Commission Act, 2008 unconstitutional, are valid and if so, under what conditions. CASE TYPE: Contempt of

Supreme Court Directs Verification of Madrasa Teacher Appointments: Snehasis Giri vs. Subhasis Mitra (2 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the implementation date for Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for Maharashtra State Financial Corporation employees (02 February 2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pay Revision, Retirement Benefits, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law

Supreme Court rules on implementation of Fifth Pay Commission for Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Employees LEGAL ISSUE: Whether denying pay revision benefits to employees of the Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC) who retired before a specific cut-off date is discriminatory and violates Article 14 of the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name:

Supreme Court settles the implementation date for Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for Maharashtra State Financial Corporation employees (02 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision benefits for MSFC employees: Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Ex-Employees Association & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2023) INSC 962 (02 February 2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 43, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Pay Revision, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement Scheme

Supreme Court rules on pay revision for retired employees of Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Date of the Judgment: 02 February 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 962 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. Can a cut-off date for implementing pay revisions unfairly exclude employees who have already retired? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court clarifies pay revision benefits for MSFC employees: Maharashtra State Financial Corporation Ex-Employees Association & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors. (2023) INSC 962 (02 February 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017 with Clause 38(v), C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 43 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a Public Service Commission award pro-rata marks to all candidates when answer keys are found to be wrong? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, C.T. Ravikumar, Clause 38(v), Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order re-evaluation of answer sheets when a Public Service Commission has already awarded pro-rata marks for questions with incorrect answer keys. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Public

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 10, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 9, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Judicial Review, M. R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the penalty of dismissal imposed on a member of the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) for misconduct, including misbehavior and insubordination while under the influence of alcohol, is justified, even if the misconduct occurred while not

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 10, Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949 with Section 11, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, M. R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was justified in interfering with the disciplinary authority’s order of dismissal of a CRPF constable for misconduct, and whether the penalty of dismissal was disproportionate to the offense. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CRPF Constable for Misconduct: Union of India vs. Sunil Kumar (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top