Service Law

Supreme Court mandates prior approval for employee termination in recognized institutions: Gajanand Sharma vs. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti (2023)

/ C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M. R. Shah, Prior Approval, Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989, Rajasthan Non-Governmental Educational Institutions Act, 1989 with Section 18, Service Law, Termination of Employment

Supreme Court mandates prior approval for employee termination in recognized institutions: Gajanand Sharma vs. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prior approval of the Director of Education is mandatory before terminating an employee of a recognized educational institution. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Gajanand Sharma vs. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti & Ors. […]

Supreme Court mandates prior approval for employee termination in recognized institutions: Gajanand Sharma vs. Adarsh Siksha Parisad Samiti (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Nursing Allowance eligibility based on qualifications: Union of India vs. Rajib Khan (2023)

/ Allowances, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Equal Pay for Equal Work, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pay Scales, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Nursing Allowance Eligibility Based on Qualifications: Union of India vs. Rajib Khan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Nursing Assistants are entitled to the same Nursing Allowance as Staff Nurses, despite differences in educational qualifications. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Union of India & Ors. vs. Rajib Khan & Ors. Judgment Date:

Supreme Court clarifies Nursing Allowance eligibility based on qualifications: Union of India vs. Rajib Khan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Nursing Allowance Parity for Nursing Assistants: Union of India vs. Rajib Khan (2023)

/ Allowances, C.T. Ravikumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Equal Pay, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pay Scales, Service Law

Supreme Court Denies Nursing Allowance Parity for Nursing Assistants: Union of India vs. Rajib Khan (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Nursing Assistants are entitled to the same Nursing Allowance as Staff Nurses when their educational qualifications and job requirements differ. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Union of India & Ors. vs. Rajib Khan &

Supreme Court Denies Nursing Allowance Parity for Nursing Assistants: Union of India vs. Rajib Khan (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Case in CISF Recruitment: Mukesh Kumar Raigar vs. Union of India (2023) INSC 30

/ Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 323, Judges, Offences against Public Tranquility, Service Law, Service Law with CISF Rules, 2001

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Case in CISF Recruitment Date of the Judgment: 16 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 30 Judges: Justice Ajay Rastogi and Justice Bela M. Trivedi. This was a division bench. The judgment was authored by Justice Bela M. Trivedi. Can a member of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF)

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Suppressing Criminal Case in CISF Recruitment: Mukesh Kumar Raigar vs. Union of India (2023) INSC 30 Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Dismissal in SBI Employee Case: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Krishna Murari, Retrospective Dismissal, Service Law, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules with Rule 19, Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Dismissal in SBI Employee Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bank must take affirmative action to continue disciplinary proceedings against an employee who reaches superannuation during the proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad Judgment Date: 9 January 2023 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Dismissal in SBI Employee Case: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Krishna Murari, Retirement, Service Law, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992 with Rule 19(1), State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992 with Rule 19(3), Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Appointing Authority of a bank can dismiss an employee after the employee has attained superannuation, when disciplinary proceedings were initiated before superannuation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Misconduct: CISF vs. Santosh Kumar Pandey (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, Disciplinary Proceedings, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Judicial Review, Misconduct, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law

CISF vs. Santosh Kumar Pandey: Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal for Misconduct Date of the Judgment: December 16, 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 8671 of 2015 Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J. and J.K. Maheshwari, J. Can a disciplinary authority’s decision to dismiss an employee be overturned by a High Court based on a re-evaluation of evidence? The

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of CISF Constable for Misconduct: CISF vs. Santosh Kumar Pandey (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows appointment of Health Workers despite delayed registration: Laxmi Saroj vs. State of UP (2022)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Hima Kohli, Judges, M. R. Shah, Recruitment, Service Law, Service Law with Narender Singh vs. State of Haryana

Supreme Court allows appointment of Health Workers despite delayed registration: Laxmi Saroj vs. State of UP (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates for government jobs can be denied appointment due to a delay in receiving a registration certificate from the concerned authority, when the delay is not attributable to the candidate. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case

Supreme Court allows appointment of Health Workers despite delayed registration: Laxmi Saroj vs. State of UP (2022) Read Post »

Seniority of Direct Recruits vs. Promotees: Supreme Court Refers Key Issues to Larger Bench in Hariharan vs. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rao (2022)

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, S. Abdul Nazeer, Seniority Dispute, Service Law, Service Law with Office Memoranda

Supreme Court Refers Seniority Dispute to Larger Bench: Hariharan vs. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rao (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Inter-se seniority dispute between direct recruits and promotees. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Hariharan & Ors. vs. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rao & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 December 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 December 2022 Citation:

Seniority of Direct Recruits vs. Promotees: Supreme Court Refers Key Issues to Larger Bench in Hariharan vs. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rao (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles appointment rules for Gram Panchayat Adhikari posts: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Karunesh Kumar & Ors. (2022) INSC 1412 (12 December 2022)

/ Estoppel, Judges, M.M. Sundresh, M.R. Shah, Recruitment Rules, Service Law, Uttar Pradesh Direct Recruitment to Group ‘C’ Posts (Mode and Procedure) Rules, 2015, Uttar Pradesh Direct Recruitment to Group ‘C’ Posts (Mode and Procedure) Rules, 2015 with Rule 2, Uttar Pradesh Gram Panchayat Adhikari Service Rules, 1978, Uttar Pradesh Gram Panchayat Adhikari Service Rules, 1978 with Rule 15, Waiting List

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Gram Panchayat Adhikari Appointments in Uttar Pradesh Date of the Judgment: 12 December 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 1412 Judges: M.R. Shah, J., and M.M. Sundresh, J. Can a candidate who participated in a selection process, based on specific rules, later claim appointment based on a different set of rules? The

Supreme Court settles appointment rules for Gram Panchayat Adhikari posts: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Karunesh Kumar & Ors. (2022) INSC 1412 (12 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the application of delay and laches in service matters: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rajmati Singh (07 December 2022)

/ Continuing Wrong, Delay and Laches, J.K. Maheshwari, Judges, Service Dispute, Service Law, Surya Kant, U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976, U.P. Public Services (Tribunal) Act, 1976 with Section 5

Supreme Court on Delay and Laches in Service Matters: State of UP vs. Rajmati Singh Date of the Judgment: 07 December 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 1053 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Surya Kant and Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari Can a government employee, who was not allowed to resume duty after being relieved for training, claim

Supreme Court clarifies the application of delay and laches in service matters: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Rajmati Singh (07 December 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Despite Past Acquittal in Domestic Dispute: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2 December 2022)

/ Appointment, C.T. Ravikumar, Criminal Antecedents, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 498A, Judges, M. R. Shah, Service Law

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Despite Past Acquittal in Domestic Dispute: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate can be denied appointment to a government job based on a past criminal case that resulted in acquittal. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya

Supreme Court Allows Appointment Despite Past Acquittal in Domestic Dispute: Pramod Singh Kirar vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (2 December 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top