Supreme Court permits Airman to continue Bank Job despite procedural lapse: Amit Kumar Roy vs. Union of India (2019) Date of the Judgment: 03 July 2019 Citation: Amit Kumar Roy vs. Union of India & Ors, Civil Appeal Nos 4605 – 4606 of 2019 (D No 27372/2015) Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and Hemant […]
Supreme Court Upholds Pension Based on Notional Salary in Contempt Case: State of Bihar vs. Meera Tiwary (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can direct the calculation of pension based on the notional salary of a higher post in a contempt proceeding, when the employee was promoted to that post but the employer claims
Supreme Court Clarifies Continuous Service for Promotion: Girish Kumar vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2019 Citation: Girish Kumar vs. State of Maharashtra and others, Civil Appeal No. 4894 of 2019, (Arising from SLP (C) No. 2784 of 2011) Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can an employee
Supreme Court Upholds Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority Act, 2018. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Reservation in Promotions. Case Name: B.K. Pavitra and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: May 10, 2019 Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2019 Citation: Not
Supreme Court Upholds Karnataka Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II (May 10, 2019) Read Post »
Supreme Court clarifies reservation benefits for migrant Scheduled Tribes in Union Territories: Director Transport Department vs. Abhinav Dipakbhai Patel (2019) Date of the Judgment: May 7, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 463 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a person belonging to a Scheduled Tribe in one state claim reservation benefits in a
Supreme Court Rules on Absorption of District Minority Welfare Officers Appointed Before 2001 Service Rules LEGAL ISSUE: Whether District Minority Welfare Officers appointed before the implementation of the 2001 Service Rules are entitled to absorption into the Minority Welfare Department. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Raja Singh & Anr. vs. State of U.P. &
Supreme Court clarifies compassionate appointment policy: Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Nirval Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person is entitled to compassionate appointment under a policy that was in force at the time of death of the employee or the new policy which came into force after the death of the employee. CASE
Supreme Court Clarifies Promotion Rights After Cadre Restructuring in Orissa Administrative Service Case (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates have a vested right to promotion based on recommendations when the cadre is restructured and the original posts are abolished. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Orissa & Anr. vs. Dhirendra Sundar Das & Ors.
Haryana C&V Teachers Not Automatically TGT: Supreme Court Decision on Promotions (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Classical and Vernacular (C&V) cadre teachers are automatically considered Trained Graduate Teachers (TGT) for promotion purposes. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Haryana and Another vs. Sandeep Singh and Others Judgment Date: May 6, 2019 Introduction Date of
Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Drug Inspector Posts: Maharashtra Public Service Commission vs. Sandeep Shriram Warade (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether research experience in a laboratory is equivalent to practical experience in the manufacture or testing of drugs for the purpose of eligibility for the post of Assistant Commissioner (Drugs) and Drug Inspectors. CASE TYPE: Service
Supreme Court Upholds Contractual Termination Without Notice: Rajasthan State Roadways vs. Paramjeet Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a contractual employee’s services can be terminated without notice as per the terms of their contract. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Rajasthan State Roadways Transport Corporation vs. Paramjeet Singh Judgment Date: May 3, 2019 Date of the
Supreme Court Reinstates Compulsory Retirement Review: State of Jammu and Kashmir vs. Farid Ahmad Tak (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was right in setting aside the order of compulsory retirement of the respondent. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Jammu and Kashmir and Ors. vs. Farid Ahmad Tak [Judgment Date]:
