Service Law

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018)

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can pass an order against a party without providing them an opportunity to be heard. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank Limited vs. Bhagirath Singh (Dead) Through L. Rs. [Judgment […]

Supreme Court Remands Case for Fresh Hearing: Sikar Kendriya Sahkari Bank vs. Bhagirath Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Marks Based on Marksheet: Dr. Ritesh Kumar Tarun vs. State of Bihar (2018)

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Marks Based on Marksheet: Dr. Ritesh Kumar Tarun vs. State of Bihar (2018) Date of the Judgment: September 24, 2018 Citation: 2018 INSC 845 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Can a candidate be denied marks for a qualification if they provide a marksheet proving they passed, even

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Marks Based on Marksheet: Dr. Ritesh Kumar Tarun vs. State of Bihar (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Employee Misconduct Case: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank (20 September 2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Employee Misconduct Case: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank (2018) Date of the Judgment: 20 September 2018 Citation: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank and Anr., Civil Appeal No.1841 of 2010 Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a bank employee be dismissed for consuming alcohol

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal in Bank Employee Misconduct Case: M.L. Singla vs. Punjab National Bank (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs lump sum payment to PWD worker in lieu of reinstatement: The Chief Engineer vs. S. Patrajan (20 September 2018)

Supreme Court directs lump sum payment to PWD worker in lieu of reinstatement: The Chief Engineer vs. S. Patrajan (2018) Date of the Judgment: 20 September 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a long-serving temporary worker be denied compensation after their services are discontinued? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court directs lump sum payment to PWD worker in lieu of reinstatement: The Chief Engineer vs. S. Patrajan (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in 1992 Patwari Selection Case: Paras Ram & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2018)

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in 1992 Patwari Selection Case: Paras Ram & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appellants’ cases should be considered separately after the High Court’s judgment was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Paras Ram &

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in 1992 Patwari Selection Case: Paras Ram & Ors. vs. State of Haryana & Ors. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rules for Railway Engineers: Prabhat Ranjan Singh vs. R.K. Kushwaha (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Seniority Rules for Railway Engineers: Prabhat Ranjan Singh vs. R.K. Kushwaha (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Indian Railways is bound by the rules framed by the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) regarding seniority, or can it formulate its own rules? And whether the Indian Railway Establishment Manual (IREM) has statutory force?

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rules for Railway Engineers: Prabhat Ranjan Singh vs. R.K. Kushwaha (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Army Postings: ASC Personnel in Operational Roles (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Army Postings: ASC Personnel in Operational Roles (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether personnel of the Army Service Corps (ASC) can be posted to operational areas. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Maj. Amod Kumar vs. Union of India & Anr. Judgment Date: September 6, 2018 Date of the Judgment: September 6, 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Upholds Army Postings: ASC Personnel in Operational Roles (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity for Absorbed Employees: M.P. Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. vs. Uma Shankar Dwivedi (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity for Absorbed Employees: M.P. Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. vs. Uma Shankar Dwivedi (2018) Date of the Judgment: 05 September 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 786 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J., Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J. Can employees absorbed from Rural Electrification Cooperative Societies be denied pay scale benefits enjoyed by other

Supreme Court Clarifies Pay Parity for Absorbed Employees: M.P. Poorva Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Co. Ltd. vs. Uma Shankar Dwivedi (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Employees Between Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand: Krishan Kumar Madan vs. Ashok Kumar (29 August 2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Employees Between Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees appointed by the State of Uttar Pradesh can be transferred to the State of Uttarakhand based on mutual consent, even if their appointments occurred after the cut-off date for automatic allocation under the Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Upholds Transfer of Employees Between Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand: Krishan Kumar Madan vs. Ashok Kumar (29 August 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidate After Re-evaluation of Marks in State Service Exam: Roma Sonkar vs. Madhya Pradesh State Public Service Commission (2018)

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidate After Re-evaluation of Marks in State Service Exam: Roma Sonkar vs. Madhya Pradesh State Public Service Commission (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate is entitled to appointment after re-evaluation of marks in a state service examination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Roma Sonkar vs. Madhya Pradesh State Public

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidate After Re-evaluation of Marks in State Service Exam: Roma Sonkar vs. Madhya Pradesh State Public Service Commission (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Addresses Promotion Quotas in Central Secretariat Service: Pankaj Kr. Mishra vs. Union of India (2018)

Supreme Court Addresses Promotion Quotas in Central Secretariat Service: Pankaj Kr. Mishra vs. Union of India (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether promotions in the Central Secretariat Service (CSS) were correctly implemented concerning the quota for seniority and Limited Departmental Competitive Examination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Pankaj Kr. Mishra & Ors. vs. Union of India

Supreme Court Addresses Promotion Quotas in Central Secretariat Service: Pankaj Kr. Mishra vs. Union of India (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Experience Requirement for Reader Post: University of Kerala vs. Saiful Islam (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Experience Requirement for Reader Post: University of Kerala vs. Saiful Islam (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the experience required for appointment to the post of Reader should be pre-Ph.D. or post-Ph.D., where Ph.D. is an essential qualification. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: University of Kerala & Anr. vs. Saiful Islam.A. & Ors.

Supreme Court Clarifies Experience Requirement for Reader Post: University of Kerala vs. Saiful Islam (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top