Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Proceedings Against Police Constable: State of Punjab vs. Prem Sarup (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Judges: Justice S.B. Sinha and Justice Cyriac Joseph Can a police officer face departmental punishment even after being acquitted in a criminal trial based on the same charges? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving a Punjab police constable who faced disciplinary […]

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Disciplinary Proceedings Against Police Constable: State of Punjab vs. Prem Sarup (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority: K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. In cases of promotions, can an employee be denied promotion based on performance appraisals? The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute over promotion to the post of Chief Manager, Rajbhasha in Senior Manager Grade, Scale IV in the Central

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority: K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rules in inter-collectorate transfers: Union of India vs. Deo Narain (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 15, 2008 Judges: C.K. Thakker, J., Lokeshwar Singh Panta, J. When an employee is transferred from one department to another on compassionate grounds, does that employee lose their previously earned seniority? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case concerning the Union of India and several

Supreme Court clarifies seniority rules in inter-collectorate transfers: Union of India vs. Deo Narain (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension disparity for pre and post 1.1.1996 Major Generals: Union of India vs. SPS Vains (Retd.) (9 September 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 9 September 2008 The Supreme Court addressed a critical question regarding pension disparities among retired Major Generals in the Indian Army. The central issue was whether officers who retired before 1 January 1996, should receive the same pension benefits as those who retired after this date, when revised pay scales took

Supreme Court settles pension disparity for pre and post 1.1.1996 Major Generals: Union of India vs. SPS Vains (Retd.) (9 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Amended Promotion Rules for UP Higher Judicial Service: V.K. Srivastava vs. Govt. of U.P. (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 4th September 2008 The Supreme Court of India, in V.K. Srivastava & Ors. vs. Govt. of U.P. & Anr., addressed a critical question regarding the retrospective application of amended service rules concerning promotions within the Uttar Pradesh Higher Judicial Service. This case highlights the conflict between established seniority rights and

Supreme Court Upholds Amended Promotion Rules for UP Higher Judicial Service: V.K. Srivastava vs. Govt. of U.P. (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal Decision on Promotion Based on Relaxed Qualification: Vijay Bala Bhanot vs. Government of NCT Delhi (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 03, 2008 The Supreme Court of India addressed the legality of promotions granted by relaxing educational qualifications, questioning whether such relaxations can be applied to individuals rather than a class or category of employees. The case revolves around Lab Technicians promoted to Technical Assistants based on relaxed criteria. The

Supreme Court Upholds Tribunal Decision on Promotion Based on Relaxed Qualification: Vijay Bala Bhanot vs. Government of NCT Delhi (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order regarding regularization of Khalasis: Union of India vs. Laxman Singh Champalal (01 September 2008)

Date of the Judgment: 01 September 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha and Cyriac Joseph, JJ. Can a High Court judgment be sustained if it lacks reasoning? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case concerning the regularization of employees in the post of Khalasis. The Court emphasized the necessity for the High Court to provide

Supreme Court sets aside High Court order regarding regularization of Khalasis: Union of India vs. Laxman Singh Champalal (01 September 2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Service Benefits between Army Personnel and GREF Officers: Ramesh Singh vs. Union of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: March 11, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., P. Sathasivam, J., Aftab Alam, J. Should employees of the Border Roads Organisation (BRO) receive the same service benefits as members of the Armed Forces? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in Ramesh Singh v. Union of India, a case

Supreme Court Denies Parity in Service Benefits between Army Personnel and GREF Officers: Ramesh Singh vs. Union of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles seniority rules for Direct Recruits and Departmental Promotees in AFHQ Civil Services: AFHQ/ISOs SOs (DP) Association & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2008)

Date of the Judgment: 19th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (civil) 1384 of 2008 Judges: H. K. Sema, Altamas Kabir, Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can the government alter seniority rules to favor one group of employees over another? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a dispute between Direct Recruits (DRs) and Departmental Promotees (DPs) within the

Supreme Court settles seniority rules for Direct Recruits and Departmental Promotees in AFHQ Civil Services: AFHQ/ISOs SOs (DP) Association & Ors vs. Union of India & Ors (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of candidates in waiting lists for public service appointments: U.P. Public Service Commission vs. Uday Kumar Upadhyaya (2008)

Date of the Judgment: 14th February 2008 Citation: [Citation details will be added when available] Judges: H.K. Sema and Markandey Katju, JJ. Does being on a waiting list for a government job guarantee you the position? The Supreme Court addressed this important question in a case involving the U.P. Public Service Commission. The court clarified

Supreme Court clarifies the rights of candidates in waiting lists for public service appointments: U.P. Public Service Commission vs. Uday Kumar Upadhyaya (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles age limit rules for direct recruitment in civil posts: Union of India vs. Shri Ramesh Singh Rajput (2007)

Date of the Judgment: December 14, 2007 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J., Aftab Alam, J. Can the government deny appointment to a selected candidate based on a discrepancy in their date of birth records? The Supreme Court addressed this issue in a case where a candidate’s school certificate and affidavit showed different dates of birth,

Supreme Court settles age limit rules for direct recruitment in civil posts: Union of India vs. Shri Ramesh Singh Rajput (2007) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the importance of civil court findings in departmental proceedings: Jasbir Singh vs. Punjab & Sind Bank (2006)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 31st October 2006 Citation: Appeal (civil) 8046 of 2004 Judges: S.B. Sinha and Markandey Katju What happens when a bank employee is accused of fraud, acquitted in criminal court, but then faces departmental proceedings? The Supreme Court addressed this critical intersection of civil and service law in the case of

Supreme Court settles the importance of civil court findings in departmental proceedings: Jasbir Singh vs. Punjab & Sind Bank (2006) Read Post »

Scroll to Top