Pension Benefits

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in insurance and banking sector: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 2(s), Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 23, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 31, Pension Benefits, Ranjan Gogoi, Resignation, Retirement, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Eligibility for Resigned Employees: LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who resigned before the implementation of retrospective pension schemes are entitled to pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. vs. Shree Lal Meena Judgment Date: 15 […]

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in insurance and banking sector: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies benefits for daily wage workers in Gujarat Forest Department: State of Gujarat vs. PWD and Forest Employees Union (2019)

/ A.K. Sikri, Daily Wage Workers, Government Resolution dated October 17, 1988, Gujarat Civil Services (Revision of Pay) Rules, 2009, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies benefits for daily wage workers in Gujarat Forest Department (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation and implementation of a Government Resolution regarding benefits for daily wage workers. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Gujarat vs. PWD and Forest Employees Union Judgment Date: 15 February 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 15 February

Supreme Court clarifies benefits for daily wage workers in Gujarat Forest Department: State of Gujarat vs. PWD and Forest Employees Union (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Fundamental Rule 9(21)(a)(i), Fundamental Rule 9(25), Fundamental Rules, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Pension Benefits, Rule 33, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Service Law

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists LEGAL ISSUE: Whether special pay granted to scientists should be included in the calculation of pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Dr. O.P. Nijhawan & Ors. Judgment Date: 03 January 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 03

Supreme Court Rules Special Pay Counts Towards Pension for Scientists in DRDO, DAE, and DOS (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Bank Retiree Benefits: R. Balakrishna Bhat vs. Bank of Baroda (2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Bank Retirees, Judges, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Bank Retiree Benefits: R. Balakrishna Bhat vs. Bank of Baroda (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of uniform pension regulations to bank retirees. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: R. Balakrishna Bhat & Ors. vs. Bank of Baroda & Ors. [Judgment Date]: May 16, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: May 16,

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals on Bank Retiree Benefits: R. Balakrishna Bhat vs. Bank of Baroda (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules Fast Track Court service counts towards pension benefits in Judicial Service: Mahesh Chandra Verma vs. State of Jharkhand (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 275, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Judicial Service, Pension Benefits, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court Counts Fast Track Court Service for Pension: Mahesh Chandra Verma vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether service as a Fast Track Court Judge should be counted for pension and other retirement benefits upon joining regular judicial service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Mahesh Chandra Verma vs. The State of Jharkhand

Supreme Court rules Fast Track Court service counts towards pension benefits in Judicial Service: Mahesh Chandra Verma vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension benefits for employees of reorganized states: Shakti Prasad Bhatt vs. State of Uttarakhand (26 April 2018)

/ Arun Mishra, Government Employees, Implications on Service Law, Judges, Pension Benefits, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit, Uttar Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2000

Supreme Court Rules Past Services Count for Pension Benefits in Reorganized States LEGAL ISSUE: Whether past services of employees in a bifurcated state should be counted for pension and other benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Shakti Prasad Bhatt ETC. ETC. vs. The State of Uttarakhand AND ORS. ETC. Judgment Date: 26 April 2018

Supreme Court settles pension benefits for employees of reorganized states: Shakti Prasad Bhatt vs. State of Uttarakhand (26 April 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of pension case: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (2018)

/ Indira Gandhi National Open University, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Service Rules, Indira Gandhi National Open University

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of pension case: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the service of an employee under the Indira Gandhi National Open University can be counted towards pensionary benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law (Pension) Case Name: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N.

Supreme Court directs expeditious disposal of pension case: Indira Gandhi National Open University vs. Dr. V.N. Rajasekharan Pillai (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Adjourns Decision on Pension Eligibility: Karan Singh vs. Delhi Transport Corporation (2017)

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Judges, Pension Benefits, Qualifying Service, Service Law, Service Law with Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a period of training and leave without pay can be included in the calculation of qualifying service for pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Karan Singh vs. Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 13 September 2017 Date of the Judgment: 13 September 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No.12743 of 2017

Supreme Court Adjourns Decision on Pension Eligibility: Karan Singh vs. Delhi Transport Corporation (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Reopens Case on Withdrawal of Office Memorandum: K.C. Bajaj vs. Union of India (2 July 2013)

/ G.S. Singhvi, Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961, Government of India (Transaction of Business) Rules, 1961 with Rule 12, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Pension Benefits, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: 2 July 2013 Judges: G.S. Singhvi, J. and Kurian Joseph, J. The Supreme Court is revisiting a case regarding the withdrawal of an Office Memorandum (O.M.) related to pension benefits. The court had previously reserved judgment, but new information has come to light. This information includes discrepancies in previous statements made

Supreme Court Reopens Case on Withdrawal of Office Memorandum: K.C. Bajaj vs. Union of India (2 July 2013) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for municipal employees: Sanchari Devi & Ors. vs. Ara Municipal Corporation & Ors. (2013) INSC 467 (25 June 2013)

/ A.K. Patnaik, Employee Rights, Judges, Pension Benefits, Pension Law, Provident Fund, Ranjan Gogoi, Retirement, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: 25 June 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 467 Judges: A.K. Patnaik, J. and Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can a municipal corporation deny pension benefits to its employees by delaying the implementation of pension rules? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case concerning the Bihar Municipal Officers and Servants

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for municipal employees: Sanchari Devi & Ors. vs. Ara Municipal Corporation & Ors. (2013) INSC 467 (25 June 2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top