Pensionary Benefits

Supreme Court clarifies pension scheme applicability for contract employees: National Institute of Rural Development vs. Shyam Sunder Prasad Sharma & Ors. (2023) INSC 148

/ Abhay S. Oka, Judges, National Institute of Rural Development (Service) Bye-laws, National Institute of Rural Development (Service) Bye-laws with Bye-law 52, Pensionary Benefits, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Law with Regularisation Rules

Supreme Court clarifies pension scheme applicability for contract employees: National Institute of Rural Development vs. Shyam Sunder Prasad Sharma & Ors. (2023) INSC 148 LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of old pension scheme versus new pension scheme for employees initially appointed on contract basis and later regularized. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: National Institute of Rural […]

Supreme Court clarifies pension scheme applicability for contract employees: National Institute of Rural Development vs. Shyam Sunder Prasad Sharma & Ors. (2023) INSC 148 Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022)

/ Armed Forces, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Hima Kohli, J B Pardiwala, Judges, Pensionary Benefits, Permanent Commission, Service Law

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether women Short Service Commissioned Officers (SSCOs) of the Indian Air Force (IAF), who were not part of the original litigation, are entitled to the same benefits as those who were, specifically

Supreme Court Grants Pensionary Benefits to Women Air Force Officers: Wg Cdr A U Tayyaba (Retd) vs. Union of India (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (18 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Contempt of Court, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Non-Compliance of Court Orders, Pensionary Benefits, Retiral Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for non-compliance of orders regarding pensionary benefits. CASE TYPE: Contempt Jurisdiction. Case Name: Bijay Kumar Sinha and Others vs. Tripurari Sharan and Others. Judgment Date: 18 January 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: Contempt

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (18 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Pension Case Due to Unreasoned High Court Order: State of Orissa vs. Chandra Nandi (2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Administrative Law, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Pensionary Benefits, Post-Retirement Benefits, Quasi-Judicial Orders, Reasoned Orders, Service Law, Service Law with Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court Remands Pension Case Due to Unreasoned High Court Order: State of Orissa vs. Chandra Nandi (2019) Date of the Judgment: April 1, 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can a High Court order be set aside if it doesn’t provide reasons for its decision? The

Supreme Court Remands Pension Case Due to Unreasoned High Court Order: State of Orissa vs. Chandra Nandi (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Pension to VSNL Employees with Less Than 10 Years of Service: P. Bandopadhya vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 216 (15 March 2019)

/ Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 37(1), Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 49(2), Indu Malhotra, Judges, Pensionary Benefits, Service Law, Service Law with Transfer of Employees, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Pension to VSNL Employees with Less Than 10 Years of Service LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of a government department converted into a Public Sector Undertaking (PSU) are eligible for pensionary benefits under the Central Government if they had less than 10 years of qualifying service at the time of absorption

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Pension to VSNL Employees with Less Than 10 Years of Service: P. Bandopadhya vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 216 (15 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes reversion order after 25 years, grants pensionary benefits: Sukh Bilash Thakur vs. Bihar State Electricity Board (2019)

/ Administrative Law, Administrative Law with Fairness, Administrative Law with Reasonableness, Arun Mishra, Judges, Navin Sinha, Pensionary Benefits, Reversion, Service Law, Service Law with Principles of Natural Justice

Supreme Court quashes reversion order after 25 years, grants pensionary benefits: Sukh Bilash Thakur vs. Bihar State Electricity Board (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can be reverted to a lower post after 25 years of service based on allegations of fraudulent appointment, especially when the initial appointment was made after due verification and competitive

Supreme Court quashes reversion order after 25 years, grants pensionary benefits: Sukh Bilash Thakur vs. Bihar State Electricity Board (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Grants Freedom Fighter Pension to Senior Citizens: Rambhau vs. State of Maharashtra (2018)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Freedom Fighter Pension, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Navin Sinha, Pension Law, Pensionary Benefits, Service Law

Supreme Court Grants Freedom Fighter Pension to Senior Citizens: Rambhau vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether senior citizens who were previously granted freedom fighter pensions, which were later cancelled, should have their pensions reinstated. CASE TYPE: Pension/Service Law Case Name: Rambhau S/O Tulshiram Ghuge vs. The State of Maharashtra and Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Grants Freedom Fighter Pension to Senior Citizens: Rambhau vs. State of Maharashtra (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top