Promotion

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on promotion: Mohammed Faizal K.A. vs. D. Sali (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a punishment imposed on an employee before the check period for promotion, but continuing into the check period, can be considered for denying promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Mohammed Faizal K.A. vs. D. Sali and Ors. [Judgment Date]: October 4, 2017 Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2017 Citation: Not […]

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on promotion: Mohammed Faizal K.A. vs. D. Sali (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies cadre restructuring in BSF: Union of India vs. S. Ravichandran (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a prior decision regarding cadre restructuring can be superseded by a later comprehensive review. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. S. Ravichandran & Ors. Date of the Judgment: 11 August 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 707 Judges: Madan B. Lokur, J., Prafulla C. Pant, J., Deepak Gupta,

Supreme Court clarifies cadre restructuring in BSF: Union of India vs. S. Ravichandran (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Promotion Based on Medical Category: SGT Chaman Lal vs. Union of India (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can be denied promotion due to being in a low medical category despite being empanelled for promotion and having a disability. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: SGT Chaman Lal vs. Union of India and Others [Judgment Date]: July 25, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 25, 2017 Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court Upholds Denial of Promotion Based on Medical Category: SGT Chaman Lal vs. Union of India (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies the Importance of ACRs in Promotions: Sivanandi vs. Rajeev Kumar (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Annual Confidential Report (ACR) is a part of an officer’s service record and if delays in writing it can be grounds for ignoring it for promotion purposes. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: P. Sivanandi vs. Rajeev Kumar & Ors. Judgment Date: 2nd February 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 2nd

Supreme Court Clarifies the Importance of ACRs in Promotions: Sivanandi vs. Rajeev Kumar (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Rules: Ad-hoc Service Not Equivalent to Regular Service in Promotion

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether ad-hoc service can be counted towards regular service for promotion eligibility. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Shri G.R.Rama Krishna & Anr. Judgment Date: 23rd August, 2013 Date of the Judgment: 23rd August, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 586 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. and A.K. Sikri, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Rules: Ad-hoc Service Not Equivalent to Regular Service in Promotion Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Decision on Promotion Despite Minor Penalty: Ram Ashish Dixit vs. Purvanchal Gramin Bank (22 August 2012)

Date of the Judgment: 22 August 2012 Citation: 2012 INSC 598 Judges: Justice Surinder Singh Nijjar and Justice H.L. Gokhale Can an employee claim promotion as a matter of right, even after facing disciplinary action? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving an officer of Purvanchal Gramin Bank. The court

Supreme Court Upholds Bank’s Decision on Promotion Despite Minor Penalty: Ram Ashish Dixit vs. Purvanchal Gramin Bank (22 August 2012) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles promotion rules for LDCs and UDCs in District Courts: Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: October 3, 2008 Judges: Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J., R.V. Raveendran J. Does a delay in seeking a promotion nullify a legitimate claim under statutory service rules? The Supreme Court in Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan examined appeals against a Delhi High Court order concerning the promotion of Lower

Supreme Court settles promotion rules for LDCs and UDCs in District Courts: Rajinder Pal Singh Lamba vs. Suraj Bhan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies promotion rules for IPS officers post-1997 Amendment: Union of India vs. K.H. Srinivasan (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 19, 2008 Judges: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, J. and Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J. Does amending promotion regulations retroactively affect the selection process for the Indian Police Service (IPS)? The Supreme Court in Union of India v. K.H. Srinivasan examined the impact of the 1997 Amendment to the Indian Police Service

Supreme Court clarifies promotion rules for IPS officers post-1997 Amendment: Union of India vs. K.H. Srinivasan (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority: K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India (2008)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 16, 2008 Judges: Tarun Chatterjee, J., Aftab Alam, J. In cases of promotions, can an employee be denied promotion based on performance appraisals? The Supreme Court of India addressed a dispute over promotion to the post of Chief Manager, Rajbhasha in Senior Manager Grade, Scale IV in the Central

Supreme Court Upholds Promotion Based on Merit-Cum-Seniority: K.M. Mishra vs. Central Bank of India (2008) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles the requirement of passing the Accounts Test for Senior Assistant post: S.P. Badrinath vs. Govt. of A.P. (2003)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 16/09/2003 The Supreme Court of India addressed the question of whether passing the Accounts Test is a mandatory requirement for promotion to the post of Senior Assistant in the Andhra Pradesh government services. This issue arose in the context of the Andhra Pradesh Ministerial Service Rules, 1966, and its applicability

Supreme Court settles the requirement of passing the Accounts Test for Senior Assistant post: S.P. Badrinath vs. Govt. of A.P. (2003) Read Post »

Scroll to Top