Provident Fund

Supreme Court Allows Switch to GPF for University Employees: University of Delhi vs. Shashi Kiran & Ors. (2022)

/ Central Government Notifications, Central Government Notifications with 1 May 1987, Judges, Pension, Provident Fund, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Allows Switch to GPF for University Employees: University of Delhi vs. Shashi Kiran & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of the University of Delhi, who initially opted for the Contributory Provident Fund (CPF) scheme, can be allowed to switch to the General Provident Fund (GPF) and Pension Scheme, especially when the University […]

Supreme Court Allows Switch to GPF for University Employees: University of Delhi vs. Shashi Kiran & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for municipal employees: Sanchari Devi & Ors. vs. Ara Municipal Corporation & Ors. (2013) INSC 467 (25 June 2013)

/ A.K. Patnaik, Employee Rights, Judges, Pension Benefits, Pension Law, Provident Fund, Ranjan Gogoi, Retirement, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: 25 June 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 467 Judges: A.K. Patnaik, J. and Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can a municipal corporation deny pension benefits to its employees by delaying the implementation of pension rules? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case concerning the Bihar Municipal Officers and Servants

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for municipal employees: Sanchari Devi & Ors. vs. Ara Municipal Corporation & Ors. (2013) INSC 467 (25 June 2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top