Public Service Commission

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017 with Clause 38(v), C.T. Ravikumar, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation of Answer Sheets, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam Date of the Judgment: 20 January 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 43 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and C.T. Ravikumar, J. Can a Public Service Commission award pro-rata marks to all candidates when answer keys are found to be wrong? The Supreme Court of India […]

Supreme Court Upholds Pro-Rata Marks in Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Miss Hage Mamung (20 January 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023)

/ Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, C.T. Ravikumar, Clause 38(v), Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission Conduct of Examination Guidelines, 2017, Examination, Judges, M.R. Shah, Public Service Commission, Re-evaluation, Service Law

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order re-evaluation of answer sheets when a Public Service Commission has already awarded pro-rata marks for questions with incorrect answer keys. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Public

Supreme Court overturns High Court order for re-evaluation in Public Service Commission Exam: Arunachal Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Hage Mamung (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Preference-Based Selection in Public Service Exams: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Manish Bakawale (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Madhya Pradesh State Civil Services Rules, 2015, Madhya Pradesh State Civil Services Rules, 2015 with Rule 4(3)(c)(2), Public Service Commission, Recruitment Rules, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Preference-Based Selection in Public Service Exams: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Manish Bakawale (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of rules regarding preference-based selection in public service examinations when a candidate is found ineligible for a higher preferred post. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs.

Supreme Court Clarifies Rules for Preference-Based Selection in Public Service Exams: Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission vs. Manish Bakawale (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Disclosure of UPSC Exam Marks Under RTI: Union Public Service Commission vs. Angesh Kumar (2018)

/ Adarsh Kumar Goel, Judges, Public Interest, Public Service Commission, Recruitment, Right to Information Act, 2005, Section 8, Right to Information Act, 2005, Service Law, Transparency, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Restricts Disclosure of UPSC Exam Marks Under RTI: Union Public Service Commission vs. Angesh Kumar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Balancing transparency and confidentiality in public examinations under the Right to Information Act, 2005. CASE TYPE: Service Law / Right to Information Case Name: Union Public Service Commission vs. Angesh Kumar & Ors. [Judgment Date]:

Supreme Court Restricts Disclosure of UPSC Exam Marks Under RTI: Union Public Service Commission vs. Angesh Kumar (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Consultation for Termination: Nagar Nigam vs. Dr. Brijbala Tewari (2017)

/ Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mandatory Consultation, Public Service Commission, R. Banumathi, Service Law, Service Rules, Termination of Service

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether termination of service without mandatory consultation with the Public Service Commission is valid under service rules. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Nagar Nigam, Kanpur Nagar & Ors. vs. Dr. (Smt.) Brijbala Tewari & Anr. Judgment Date: July 10, 2017 Date of the Judgment: July 10, 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Consultation for Termination: Nagar Nigam vs. Dr. Brijbala Tewari (2017) Read Post »

Scroll to Top