Recruitment Rules

Supreme Court settles promotion rules in Assam Rifles: Union of India vs. Krishna Kumar (2019)

Supreme Court clarifies promotion rules in Assam Rifles: Union of India vs. Krishna Kumar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether promotions should be based on rules existing when vacancies arise or when the promotion is considered. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Krishna Kumar & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 January 2019 […]

Supreme Court settles promotion rules in Assam Rifles: Union of India vs. Krishna Kumar (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Technician-III Posts: Diploma Holders Not Equivalent to ITI (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Technician-III Posts: Diploma Holders Not Equivalent to ITI (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a diploma in electrical engineering is equivalent to an ITI certification for the post of Technician-III. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Zahoor Ahmad Rather and Ors. vs. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and Ors. Judgment Date: 05 December 2018

Supreme Court Clarifies Eligibility for Technician-III Posts: Diploma Holders Not Equivalent to ITI (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Appointment Rules for Higher Secondary Teachers in Kerala: V.K. Girija vs. Reshma Parayil (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Appointment Rules for Higher Secondary Teachers in Kerala: V.K. Girija vs. Reshma Parayil (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of rules for appointment of teachers in aided Higher Secondary Schools in Kerala. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: V.K. Girija vs. Reshma Parayil & Ors. Judgment Date: 04 December 2018 Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Clarifies Appointment Rules for Higher Secondary Teachers in Kerala: V.K. Girija vs. Reshma Parayil (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Filling of Vacant Sub-Inspector Posts in Uttar Pradesh: Alok Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. (2018)

Supreme Court Directs Filling of Vacant Sub-Inspector Posts in Uttar Pradesh LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of recruitment rules and filling of vacancies in public employment. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Alok Kumar Singh & Others vs. State of U.P. & Others Judgment Date: 27 November 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 November 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Directs Filling of Vacant Sub-Inspector Posts in Uttar Pradesh: Alok Kumar Singh vs. State of U.P. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Illegal Appointment: Union of India vs. Raghuwar Pal Singh (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Illegal Appointment: Union of India vs. Raghuwar Pal Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment made without the approval of the competent authority is a nullity or a mere irregularity. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India and Anr. vs. Raghuwar Pal Singh Judgment Date: March 13, 2018

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Illegal Appointment: Union of India vs. Raghuwar Pal Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Hindi Language Assistants in Karnataka: State of Karnataka vs. Shankar Baburao Kangralkar (2018)

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Hindi Language Assistants in Karnataka LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a candidate for the post of Hindi Language Assistant must possess a B.Ed. degree with Hindi as a teaching method, or if a general B.Ed. degree suffices. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Karnataka & Ors. vs. Shankar Baburao

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Hindi Language Assistants in Karnataka: State of Karnataka vs. Shankar Baburao Kangralkar (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Psychologist posts: Ashish Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (31 January 2018)

Supreme Court rules on Psychologist Post Eligibility: Ashish Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2018) Date of the Judgment: 31 January 2018 Citation: Ashish Kumar vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. (2018) INSC 71 Judges: A.K. Sikri, J., Ashok Bhushan, J. Can a candidate be denied a job after being selected, if the

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Psychologist posts: Ashish Kumar vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (31 January 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs Tribunal to Expedite Constable Appointment Case: Shaik Shahanaj vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (24 November 2017)

Can a delay in producing a non-creamy layer certificate cost someone a job? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this issue in a case concerning the selection of a police constable. The court directed the State Administrative Tribunal to expedite the matter. This case highlights the importance of timely submission of documents in government

Supreme Court directs Tribunal to Expedite Constable Appointment Case: Shaik Shahanaj vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (24 November 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Medical Lab Technicians: Sukhwinder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates who possess a matriculation certificate and a diploma in Medical Laboratory Technology are eligible for appointment as Medical Laboratory Technicians, despite rules requiring a Senior Secondary certificate. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Sukhwinder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. Judgment Date: 04 September 2017 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court clarifies eligibility for Medical Lab Technicians: Sukhwinder Kumar & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Ors. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidates Despite Rule Changes: State of West Bengal vs. Debasis Das (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether candidates selected under an earlier recruitment process should be appointed despite subsequent changes in the recruitment rules. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Debasis Das & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 01 September 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 01 September 2017 Citation: Not Available Judges:

Supreme Court Directs Appointment of Candidates Despite Rule Changes: State of West Bengal vs. Debasis Das (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Rules: Ad-hoc Service Not Equivalent to Regular Service in Promotion

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether ad-hoc service can be counted towards regular service for promotion eligibility. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Union of India & Ors. vs. Shri G.R.Rama Krishna & Anr. Judgment Date: 23rd August, 2013 Date of the Judgment: 23rd August, 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 586 Judges: K.S. Radhakrishnan, J. and A.K. Sikri, J.

Supreme Court Upholds Recruitment Rules: Ad-hoc Service Not Equivalent to Regular Service in Promotion Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Eligibility in Teacher Recruitment: Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (29 July 2013)

Date of the Judgment: 29 July 2013 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 6116 of 2013 Judges: Dr. B.S. Chauhan, J. and S.A. Bobde, J. Can a candidate be appointed to a government job if they did not possess the required educational qualification on the last date for submitting applications? The Supreme Court of India addressed this

Supreme Court Upholds Cut-off Date for Eligibility in Teacher Recruitment: Rakesh Kumar Sharma vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (29 July 2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top