Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Provisional Employee: Kamlesh vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a provisionally appointed employee can claim regularization of services due to prolonged service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Kamlesh vs. Union of India Through Secretary Department of Post & Ors. Judgment Date: 20 January 2020 Date of the […]
Supreme Court Clarifies Regularization and Promotion Rights for Ad-Hoc Employees: Siraj Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prior ad-hoc service of an employee appointed through a selection process can be counted for promotion after regularization, even if the initial appointment lacked formal concurrence from the Public Service Commission. CASE TYPE: Service
Supreme Court Upholds Appointment of Teacher Under Rehbar-e-Taleem Scheme: Meena Sharma vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appointment made under the Rehbar-e-Taleem (RET) Scheme can be challenged after a significant delay, especially when the appointee has been regularized and the initial selection process involved a combined list for two adjacent
Supreme Court Modifies Regularization Benefits for Entomologists: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Harleen Kaur & Ors. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in directing the Municipal Corporation to provide monetary benefits to the employees from 2008, after directing regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: North Delhi Municipal Corporation vs. Harleen Kaur
Supreme Court quashes regularization obtained by fraud: Punjab Urban Planning vs. Karamjit Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who fraudulently obtains regularization is entitled to a disciplinary inquiry before termination. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Punjab Urban Planning and Development Authority & Anr. vs. Karamjit Singh [Judgment Date]: April 15, 2019 Date of
Supreme Court Upholds Appointments of Junior Linemen, Sets Aside High Court Order: K. Amarnath Reddy vs. A.P.S.P.D.C.L. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of appointments to the posts of Junior Linemen in Andhra Pradesh Transmission Corporation and Distribution Companies. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: K. Amarnath Reddy & Ors. vs. Chairman & Managing Director, A.P.S.P.D.C.L. &
Supreme Court overturns High Court order on continuity of service for re-engaged contract employees: APSRTC vs. B. Venkataiah (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of their initial termination until their re-engagement for the purpose of regularization, even if the termination was not challenged. CASE
Supreme Court Denies Continuity of Service to Re-engaged Contract Employee: APSRTC vs. K. Sathaiah (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of termination until re-engagement for the purpose of regularization. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: APSRTC & Ors. vs. Sri K. Sathaiah Judgment Date:
Supreme Court on Continuity of Service for Re-engaged Contract Employees: APSRTC vs. A. Sanjeev Reddy (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a re-engaged contract employee is entitled to continuity of service from the date of termination until the date of re-engagement for regularization purposes. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: APSRTC & Ors. vs. Sri A. Sanjeev
Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Illegal Appointments in Bihar Health Services LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees appointed illegally, without following due process, can claim regularization based on long service. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The State of Bihar and Ors. vs. Kirti Narayan Prasad [Judgment Date]: 30 November 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 30
Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Illegal Appointments in Bihar Health Services Read Post »
Can a government deny regularization to an employee for marrying a few days before the prescribed age, while granting it to others in similar situations? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue in a case concerning the regularization of a Forest Guard in Madhya Pradesh. The Court directed the concerned authority to consider the
Date of the Judgment: 01 September 2008 Judges: S.B. Sinha and Cyriac Joseph, JJ. Can a High Court judgment be sustained if it lacks reasoning? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a case concerning the regularization of employees in the post of Khalasis. The Court emphasized the necessity for the High Court to provide
