Reservation in Promotions

Supreme Court Directs Notional Promotion for Disabled Employee: RBI vs. A.K. Nair (2023)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 142, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Reservation in Promotions, Service Law, Service Law with Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, Service Law with Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Supreme Court Directs Notional Promotion for Disabled Employee: RBI vs. A.K. Nair (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation in promotions, and whether a disabled candidate should be given the same relaxation in standards as SC/ST candidates. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disability Rights Case Name: Reserve Bank of India & Ors. […]

Supreme Court Directs Notional Promotion for Disabled Employee: RBI vs. A.K. Nair (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “in-service” doctor status for PG admissions in ESIC: Hemant Kumar Verma vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation (22 July 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Employees State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 59(B), In-service Doctors, Judges, Reservation in Promotions, Service Law

Supreme Court Upholds Distinction Between Junior Residents and In-Service Doctors in ESIC: Hemant Kumar Verma vs. ESIC (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Junior Resident Doctors are equivalent to ‘in-service’ doctors for availing reservation in Post Graduate medical courses. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Education Law Case Name: Hemant Kumar Verma & Ors vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation

Supreme Court clarifies “in-service” doctor status for PG admissions in ESIC: Hemant Kumar Verma vs. Employees State Insurance Corporation (22 July 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies data collection for reservation in promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Fundamental Rights, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Reservation in Promotions, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Law with Cadre

Supreme Court Clarifies Data Collection for Reservation in Promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the method of collecting quantifiable data for reservation in promotions for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs). CASE TYPE: Service Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Jarnail Singh & Ors. vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta &

Supreme Court clarifies data collection for reservation in promotions: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies implementation of Reservation Act 2018 in Karnataka: B K Pavithra vs. Union of India (2020)

/ Article 142, Constitution of India, Constitutional Law, Creamy Layer Principle, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Order LV, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Order XII Rule 3, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Post-Based Reservations, Reservation in Promotions, Service Law, Supreme Court Rules, 2013, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies implementation of Reservation Act 2018 in Karnataka: B K Pavithra vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Supreme Court can entertain applications for directions that challenge subsequent government orders implementing a previously upheld act. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: B K Pavithra and Ors. vs. Union of India and

Supreme Court clarifies implementation of Reservation Act 2018 in Karnataka: B K Pavithra vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles reservation in promotions for persons with disabilities: Siddaraju vs. State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 26 (14 January 2020)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16(1), Constitutional Law with Article 16(4), Judges, Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995, Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 with Section 33, R.F. Nariman, Reservation in Promotions, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Clarifies Reservation in Promotions for Persons with Disabilities Date of the Judgment: 14 January 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 26 Judges: R.F. Nariman, J., Aniruddha Bose, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can persons with disabilities be given reservation in promotions? The Supreme Court of India addressed this crucial question, clarifying the extent of reservation for

Supreme Court settles reservation in promotions for persons with disabilities: Siddaraju vs. State of Karnataka (2020) INSC 26 (14 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Karnataka Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II (May 10, 2019)

/ Consequential Seniority, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 335, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Fundamental Rights, Judges, Reservation in Promotions, Seniority Rules, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority Act, 2018. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Reservation in Promotions. Case Name: B.K. Pavitra and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. Judgment Date: May 10, 2019 Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2019 Citation: Not

Supreme Court Upholds Karnataka Reservation Act 2018: B.K. Pavitra II (May 10, 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies data requirements for SC/ST promotion reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018)

/ Adequate Representation, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 341, Dipak Misra, Fundamental Rights, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Kurian Joseph, R.F. Nariman, Reservation in Promotions, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court clarifies data requirements for SC/ST promotion reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the state needs to collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) for reservation in promotions. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Constitutional Law Case Name: Jarnail Singh & Others vs. Lachhmi

Supreme Court clarifies data requirements for SC/ST promotion reservations: Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top