Resignation

Supreme Court settles dispute on withdrawal of resignation in service matter: S.D. Manohara vs. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (2024) INSC 693 (13 September 2024)

/ General Principles of Law, Reinstatement, Resignation, Resignation can be withdrawn before acceptance, Service Law, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Reinstates Employee: Resignation Withdrawal Dispute Resolved (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s resignation was effectively withdrawn before its acceptance by the employer. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: S.D. Manohara vs. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 September 2024 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 13 September 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC […]

Supreme Court settles dispute on withdrawal of resignation in service matter: S.D. Manohara vs. Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (2024) INSC 693 (13 September 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Teacher After Resignation Withdrawal: Shriram Manohar Bande vs. Uktranti Mandal & Ors. (2024)

/ Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977, Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 with Rule 40, Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 with Section 7, Resignation, Service Law, Termination

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Teacher After Resignation Withdrawal: Shriram Manohar Bande vs. Uktranti Mandal & Ors. (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a resignation can be effective even if its acceptance is not communicated to the employee before the employee withdraws the resignation. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service)

Supreme Court Upholds Termination of Teacher After Resignation Withdrawal: Shriram Manohar Bande vs. Uktranti Mandal & Ors. (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation Before Effective Date: Suman V. Jain vs. Marwadi Sammelan (20 February 2024)

/ Contract Law, Estoppel, Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994 with Section 59(1), Resignation, Service Law, Waiver, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation Before Effective Date: Suman V. Jain vs. Marwadi Sammelan (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can withdraw a prospective resignation before its effective date. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Dr. Mrs. Suman V. Jain vs. Marwadi Sammelan through its Secretary and Others. Judgment Date: 20 February 2024 Date

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation Before Effective Date: Suman V. Jain vs. Marwadi Sammelan (20 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of resignation: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla (23 March 2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 26, Judges, Krishna Murari, Resignation, Service Law, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Allows Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2023) Date of the Judgment: 23 March 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 228 Judges: Aniruddha Bose, J., Krishna Murari, J. Can an employee withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted by the employer? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed

Supreme Court allows withdrawal of resignation: Govt. of NCT of Delhi vs. Kamlesh Rani Bhatla (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (23 March 2023)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972, Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 with Rule 26, Judges, Krishna Murari, Procedural Compliance, Resignation, Service Law, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted, particularly when the employer’s rejection was based on a different ground than the validity of the withdrawal itself. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Resignation: Kamlesh Rani Bhatla vs. Govt. of NCT of Delhi (23 March 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “Late Entrant” status for pension benefits in Armed Forces: Union of India vs. Abhiram Verma (2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Regulations, Pension Regulations, 1961 with Regulation 15, Pension Regulations, 1961 with Regulation 25(a), Resignation, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement

Supreme Court clarifies “Late Entrant” status for pension benefits in Armed Forces: Union of India vs. Abhiram Verma (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an officer who resigns from service can be considered a “late entrant” for pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Armed Forces Pension Case Name: Union of India and another vs. Abhiram Verma Judgment

Supreme Court clarifies “Late Entrant” status for pension benefits in Armed Forces: Union of India vs. Abhiram Verma (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies Voluntary Retirement vs. Resignation in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Case (15 April 2020)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 with Section 4(1)(b), R. Banumathi, Rajasthan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1996, Rajasthan Civil Services Pension Rules, 1996 with Rule 50, Resignation, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement

Supreme Court clarifies Voluntary Retirement vs. Resignation in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s application for voluntary retirement, if not explicitly accepted, can be deemed accepted, especially when followed by a resignation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Ltd. & Ors. vs. Smt. Mohani Devi

Supreme Court clarifies Voluntary Retirement vs. Resignation in Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Case (15 April 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Resignation Withdrawal Rules for Tamil Nadu Police: Director General of Police vs. M Jeyanthi (2019)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, Resignation, Service Law, Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act 2016, Tamil Nadu Government Servants (Conditions of Service) Act 2016 with Section 50, Tamil Nadu Police Subordinate Services, Withdrawal of Resignation

Supreme Court Clarifies Resignation Withdrawal Rules for Tamil Nadu Police: Director General of Police vs. M Jeyanthi (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a police constable can withdraw their resignation after it has been accepted by the appointing authority, but before the expiry of the notice period. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Director General of

Supreme Court Clarifies Resignation Withdrawal Rules for Tamil Nadu Police: Director General of Police vs. M Jeyanthi (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in insurance and banking sector: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 2(s), Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 23, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 31, Pension Benefits, Ranjan Gogoi, Resignation, Retirement, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Eligibility for Resigned Employees: LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who resigned before the implementation of retrospective pension schemes are entitled to pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. vs. Shree Lal Meena Judgment Date: 15

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in insurance and banking sector: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) INSC 217 (15 March 2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pension Law, Pension Rules, Pension Schemes, Ranjan Gogoi, Resignation, Retirement, Retirement Benefits, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Rules

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation Date of the Judgment: 15 March 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 217 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J, K.M. Joseph, J. Can an employee who resigned before a pension scheme was implemented, but after the date from which the scheme was made retrospectively

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) INSC 217 (15 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court rules resignation entails forfeiture of past service in pension case: State of Punjab vs. Gurbaran Singh (2019)

/ Forfeiture of Service, Indu Malhotra, Judges, Pension, Punjab Civil Services Rules, Punjab Civil Services Rules with Rule 7.5, Resignation, Service Law, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Rules Resignation Entails Forfeiture of Past Service: State of Punjab vs. Gurbaran Singh (2019) Date of the Judgment: March 01, 2019 Citation: 2019 INSC 182 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Indu Malhotra, J. Can an employee who resigns from service claim pensionary benefits for their past service? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court rules resignation entails forfeiture of past service in pension case: State of Punjab vs. Gurbaran Singh (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies resignation rules for employees under the Industrial Employment Act: Sanjay Jain vs. National Aviation Co. (2018)

/ Arun Mishra, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 with Standing Order 18, Judges, Labour Law, Resignation, Standing Orders, Termination of Service, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Clarifies Resignation Rules Under Industrial Employment Act: Sanjay Jain vs. National Aviation Co. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee’s resignation is effective immediately upon serving the required notice period, or if it requires acceptance by the employer under the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946. CASE TYPE: Labour Law Case Name: Sanjay Jain

Supreme Court clarifies resignation rules for employees under the Industrial Employment Act: Sanjay Jain vs. National Aviation Co. (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top