Retiral Benefits

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Revision for UP Jal Nigam Employees, Dismissing Namami Gange Department’s Challenge: Namami Gange and Rural Water Supply Department vs. Om Prakash Singh (2025) INSC 40

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Pay Revision for UP Jal Nigam Employees: Namami Gange & Rural Water Supply Dept. vs. Om Prakash Singh (2025) INSC 40 LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the newly formed Namami Gange and Rural Water Supply Department is liable to pay the revised pay and retiral benefits to employees of the erstwhile Uttar […]

Supreme Court Upholds Pay Revision for UP Jal Nigam Employees, Dismissing Namami Gange Department’s Challenge: Namami Gange and Rural Water Supply Department vs. Om Prakash Singh (2025) INSC 40 Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies State’s responsibility for retiral benefits in aided institutions: Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith vs. Government of Gujarat (2024) INSC 935 (02 December 2024)

Supreme Court Clarifies State’s Responsibility for Retiral Benefits in Aided Institutions Date of the Judgment: 02 December 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 935 Judges: J.K. Maheshwari, J. and Rajesh Bindal, J. Who is responsible for paying the retirement benefits of employees in grant-in-aid institutions? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, clarifying the obligations

Supreme Court clarifies State’s responsibility for retiral benefits in aided institutions: Nutan Bharti Gram Vidyapith vs. Government of Gujarat (2024) INSC 935 (02 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs UP to Pay Full Dues to Employee Wrongly Deprived of Salary: State of U.P. vs Baleshwar Singh (2023)

Supreme Court Directs UP to Pay Full Dues to Employee Wrongly Deprived of Salary: State of U.P. vs Baleshwar Singh (2023) Date of the Judgment: 9th November 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 1031 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Pankaj Mithal, J. Can a state government deny an employee their salary and retiral benefits due to

Supreme Court Directs UP to Pay Full Dues to Employee Wrongly Deprived of Salary: State of U.P. vs Baleshwar Singh (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Claim After Settlement: Syndicate Bank vs. N.R. Bhat (2023)

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee can claim pension benefits after a settlement agreement where such benefits were not explicitly included, especially when the employee had prior opportunities to opt for a pension scheme. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Syndicate Bank vs. N.R. Bhat Judgment Date: 10th October 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 10th

Supreme Court Denies Pension Claim After Settlement: Syndicate Bank vs. N.R. Bhat (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (18 January 2022)

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Contempt of Court for non-compliance of orders regarding pensionary benefits. CASE TYPE: Contempt Jurisdiction. Case Name: Bijay Kumar Sinha and Others vs. Tripurari Sharan and Others. Judgment Date: 18 January 2022 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: Contempt

Supreme Court Holds Bihar in Contempt for Non-Compliance in Pension Case (18 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Retiral Benefits for IG Rank Officer Despite Medical Unfitness: Shamsher Singh Sandhu vs. Union of India (2020)

Supreme Court Directs Retiral Benefits for IG Rank Officer Despite Medical Unfitness: Shamsher Singh Sandhu vs. Union of India (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an officer who was promoted to the rank of Inspector General of Police (IG) and subsequently reverted due to medical unfitness, is entitled to retiral benefits of the IG rank. CASE TYPE:

Supreme Court Directs Retiral Benefits for IG Rank Officer Despite Medical Unfitness: Shamsher Singh Sandhu vs. Union of India (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Rejects Retiral Benefits Claim: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudarshana Chatterjee (2019) – Employee Conduct

Supreme Court Rejects Retiral Benefits Claim: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudarshana Chatterjee (2019) – Employee Conduct LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee who joins another service without proper approval and without getting her leave sanctioned is entitled to retiral benefits from her previous employer. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State of Uttar Pradesh &

Supreme Court Rejects Retiral Benefits Claim: State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Sudarshana Chatterjee (2019) – Employee Conduct Read Post »

Supreme Court settles absorption of District Minority Welfare Officers appointed before 2001 Rules in service law (06 May 2019)

Supreme Court Rules on Absorption of District Minority Welfare Officers Appointed Before 2001 Service Rules LEGAL ISSUE: Whether District Minority Welfare Officers appointed before the implementation of the 2001 Service Rules are entitled to absorption into the Minority Welfare Department. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Raja Singh & Anr. vs. State of U.P. &

Supreme Court settles absorption of District Minority Welfare Officers appointed before 2001 Rules in service law (06 May 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018)

Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an Army Medical Corps officer is entitled to pay and allowances for an extended period of study leave, when the extension was sanctioned by the President of India. CASE TYPE: Service

Supreme Court Upholds Pay for Extended Study Leave in Army Medical Corps Case: Union of India vs. Col. P.D. Poonekar (2018) Read Post »

Railway Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court clarifies principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings (28th May 2009)

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28th May 2009 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma, Hon’ble Dr. Justice B.S. Chauhan Can a disciplinary inquiry be sustained on vague charges? The Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. vs. Gyan Chand Chattar

Railway Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court clarifies principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings (28th May 2009) Read Post »

Scroll to Top