Retirement

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Post-Retirement: State Bank of India vs. Navin Kumar Sinha (2024) INSC 874 (19 November 2024)

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Retirement, Service Law, State Bank of India Act, 1955, State Bank of India Act, 1955 with Section 43, State Bank of India Service Rules, 1992

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Post-Retirement Date of the Judgment: 19 November 2024 Citation: (2024) INSC 874 Judges: Abhay S. Oka, J. and Ujjal Bhuyan, J. Can a disciplinary proceeding initiated against a bank officer after their retirement be considered valid? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this critical question in […]

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Disciplinary Proceedings Initiated Post-Retirement: State Bank of India vs. Navin Kumar Sinha (2024) INSC 874 (19 November 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Krishna Murari, Retirement, Service Law, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992 with Rule 19(1), State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992 with Rule 19(3), Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Appointing Authority of a bank can dismiss an employee after the employee has attained superannuation, when disciplinary proceedings were initiated before superannuation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in insurance and banking sector: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 2(s), Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 23, Life Insurance Corporation of India (Employees) Pension Rules, 1995 with Rule 31, Pension Benefits, Ranjan Gogoi, Resignation, Retirement, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Pension Eligibility for Resigned Employees: LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees who resigned before the implementation of retrospective pension schemes are entitled to pension benefits. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Senior Divisional Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. vs. Shree Lal Meena Judgment Date: 15

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for resigned employees in insurance and banking sector: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) INSC 217 (15 March 2019)

/ Judges, K.M. Joseph, Pension Law, Pension Rules, Pension Schemes, Ranjan Gogoi, Resignation, Retirement, Retirement Benefits, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Service Rules

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation Date of the Judgment: 15 March 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 217 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, CJI, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, J, K.M. Joseph, J. Can an employee who resigned before a pension scheme was implemented, but after the date from which the scheme was made retrospectively

Supreme Court settles pension eligibility for employees resigning before scheme implementation: Senior Divisional Manager, LIC vs. Shree Lal Meena (2019) INSC 217 (15 March 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Deny Voluntary Retirement in Public Interest: State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Tonmoy Mondal (2019)

/ Arun Mishra, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Navin Sinha, Public Interest, Retirement, Service Law, Voluntary Retirement, West Bengal Service Rules, 1971, West Bengal Service Rules, 1971 with Rule 75

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Deny Voluntary Retirement in Public Interest: State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Tonmoy Mondal (2019) Date of the Judgment: March 12, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 178 Judges: Arun Mishra, Navin Sinha, Indira Banerjee, JJ. Can a government employee’s request for voluntary retirement be denied if it goes against public

Supreme Court Upholds State’s Right to Deny Voluntary Retirement in Public Interest: State of West Bengal vs. Dr. Tonmoy Mondal (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Case, Leaving Question of Law Open (25 October 2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Retirement, Service Law

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Case, Leaving Question of Law Open (25 October 2018) LEGAL ISSUE: The core legal issue revolves around a service matter concerning a retired employee. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Bibhas Chandra Bakshi & Ors. Judgment Date: 25 October 2018 Date of the

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Eastern Coalfields Ltd. Case, Leaving Question of Law Open (25 October 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for municipal employees: Sanchari Devi & Ors. vs. Ara Municipal Corporation & Ors. (2013) INSC 467 (25 June 2013)

/ A.K. Patnaik, Employee Rights, Judges, Pension Benefits, Pension Law, Provident Fund, Ranjan Gogoi, Retirement, Retirement Benefits, Service Law

Date of the Judgment: 25 June 2013 Citation: (2013) INSC 467 Judges: A.K. Patnaik, J. and Ranjan Gogoi, J. Can a municipal corporation deny pension benefits to its employees by delaying the implementation of pension rules? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in a case concerning the Bihar Municipal Officers and Servants

Supreme Court clarifies pension eligibility for municipal employees: Sanchari Devi & Ors. vs. Ara Municipal Corporation & Ors. (2013) INSC 467 (25 June 2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top