Service Law with Rule 14

Supreme Court Allows Promotion Despite Simultaneous Degrees: A. Dharmaraj vs. Chief Educational Officer (2022)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, Distance Education, Education Law, Eligibility Criteria, Judges, M. R. Shah, Promotion, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 14, Teacher Promotion

Supreme Court Allows Promotion Despite Simultaneous Degrees: A. Dharmaraj vs. Chief Educational Officer (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether obtaining two degrees simultaneously disqualifies a teacher from promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: A. Dharmaraj vs. The Chief Educational Officer, Pudukkottai & Ors. [Judgment Date]: February 18, 2022 Date of the Judgment: February 18, 2022. Citation: […]

Supreme Court Allows Promotion Despite Simultaneous Degrees: A. Dharmaraj vs. Chief Educational Officer (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows promotion of teacher with dual degrees: A. Dharmaraj vs. The Chief Educational Officer (2022)

/ B. V. Nagarathna, Judges, M. R. Shah, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 14, Teacher Promotion Rules

Supreme Court allows promotion of teacher with dual degrees: A. Dharmaraj vs. The Chief Educational Officer (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a teacher who obtained two degrees, B.A. (English) and M.A. (Tamil), through distance education in overlapping academic years is ineligible for promotion. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: A. Dharmaraj vs. The Chief Educational Officer,

Supreme Court allows promotion of teacher with dual degrees: A. Dharmaraj vs. The Chief Educational Officer (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Rule 14

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings can be validated by ex-post facto approval from the disciplinary authority. CASE TYPE: Service Law; Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India & Anr.

Supreme Court quashes ex-post facto approval of charge memorandum in disciplinary proceedings: Sunny Abraham vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top