Service Law with Writ Petition

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of canteen workers’ regularization: Tuticorin Port Trust Case (01 April 2019)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Dinesh Maheshwari, Judges, Regularization of Employees, Service Law, Service Law with Writ Petition

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of canteen workers’ regularization: Tuticorin Port Trust Case (2019) Date of the Judgment: 01 April 2019 Citation: Not Available Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., Dinesh Maheshwari, J. Can canteen workers in a Port Trust claim to be regular employees of the trust? The Supreme Court addressed this question in a […]

Supreme Court orders fresh consideration of canteen workers’ regularization: Tuticorin Port Trust Case (01 April 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Necessary Parties in Writ Petitions Challenging Tribunal Orders: M.S. Kazi vs. Muslim Education Society (2016)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Constitutional Law with Article 227, D.Y. Chandrachud, Gujarat Secondary Education Act 1972, Gujarat Secondary Education Act 1972 with Section 38, Gujarat Secondary Education Act 1972 with Section 39, Judges, Service Law, Service Law with Tribunal, Service Law with Writ Petition, T.S. Thakur

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a tribunal is a necessary party in a writ petition challenging its order. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: M.S. Kazi vs. Muslim Education Society & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 22 August 2016 Date of the Judgment: 22 August 2016 Citation: (2016) INSC 798 Judges: T.S. Thakur, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr. D.Y.

Supreme Court Clarifies Necessary Parties in Writ Petitions Challenging Tribunal Orders: M.S. Kazi vs. Muslim Education Society (2016) Read Post »

Scroll to Top