Service Regulations

Supreme Court settles promotion criteria: ESIC Regulations prevail over DACP Scheme (January 20, 2022)

/ A S Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948, Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 17, Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 with Section 97, Judges, Promotion, Service Law, Service Regulations

Supreme Court Clarifies Applicability of DACP Scheme vs. ESIC Regulations in Promotions LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Dynamic Assured Career Progression (DACP) Scheme or the Employees’ State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) Recruitment Regulations govern the promotion of Assistant Professors to Associate Professors. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Employees’ State Insurance Corporation vs. Union of India […]

Supreme Court settles promotion criteria: ESIC Regulations prevail over DACP Scheme (January 20, 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restricts Representation by Ex-Employees in Departmental Inquiries: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena (2022)

/ Departmental Inquiry, Judges, M.R. Shah, Right to Representation, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Service Regulations

Supreme Court Restricts Representation by Ex-Employees in Departmental Inquiries: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee has an absolute right to be represented by a former employee in departmental proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: The Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank (RMGB) & Anr. vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena

Supreme Court Restricts Representation by Ex-Employees in Departmental Inquiries: Rajasthan Marudhara Gramin Bank vs. Ramesh Chandra Meena (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Employee in U.P. Milk Union Case (23 March 2021)

/ Disciplinary Proceedings, Hemant Gupta, Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Service Regulations, Uday Umesh Lalit, Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965, Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 with Section 121, Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 with Section 122, Uttar Pradesh Co-operative Societies Act, 1965 with Section 122-A

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action: Jagpal Singh Case (2021) Date of the Judgment: 23 March 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 152 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J., Hemant Gupta, J., S. Ravindra Bhat, J. (authored by Hemant Gupta, J.) Can a disciplinary action against an employee be overturned due to procedural errors, even if the charges are

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Action Against Employee in U.P. Milk Union Case (23 March 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Use of ‘Architect’ Title Under Architects Act: Council of Architecture vs. Mukesh Goyal (2020)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Architects Act, 1972, Architects Act, 1972 with Section 37, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Registration of Architects, Regulatory Bodies, Regulatory Law, Service Regulations

Supreme Court Clarifies Use of ‘Architect’ Title Under Architects Act: Council of Architecture vs. Mukesh Goyal (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972, prohibits individuals not registered with the Council of Architecture from practicing architecture or merely restricts the use of the title “Architect”. CASE TYPE: Regulatory/Service Law Case Name: Council

Supreme Court Clarifies Use of ‘Architect’ Title Under Architects Act: Council of Architecture vs. Mukesh Goyal (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Seniority Based on Roster, Not Just Appointment Date: Dharmendra Prasad & Ors. vs. Sunil Kumar & Ors. (2019) INSC 949 (06 December 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 309, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Seniority, Service Law, Service Regulations

Supreme Court Directs Seniority Based on Roster, Not Just Appointment Date Date of the Judgment: 06 December 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 949 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., Hemant Gupta, J. Can a seniority list be based solely on the date of appointment, or should it also consider the merit list and reservation roster? The Supreme

Supreme Court Directs Seniority Based on Roster, Not Just Appointment Date: Dharmendra Prasad & Ors. vs. Sunil Kumar & Ors. (2019) INSC 949 (06 December 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Integrated Seniority for LDCs and Typists: K. Anjaneyulu vs. T. Ashok Raju (24 July 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Electricity Supply Act, Electricity Supply Act with Section 79, Judges, Promotions, R. Banumathi, Service Law, Service Regulations

Supreme Court Upholds Integrated Seniority for LDCs and Typists: K. Anjaneyulu vs. T. Ashok Raju (2019) Date of the Judgment: 24 July 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 717 Judges: Justice R. Banumathi and Justice A.S. Bopanna Can the training period of Lower Division Clerks (LDCs) be counted for seniority when they are considered for promotion to

Supreme Court Upholds Integrated Seniority for LDCs and Typists: K. Anjaneyulu vs. T. Ashok Raju (24 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Policy Decision on Promotion Channels for Technical Staff: T.N. Electricity Board vs. T.N. Electricity Board Thozhilalar Aykkiya Sangam (2008)

/ A.K. Mathur, Aftab Alam, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 16, Constitutional Law with Article 19(1)(g), Judges, Service Regulations

Date of the Judgment: 14th February 2008 Citation: Appeal (civil) 1279 of 2008 Judges: A.K. Mathur and Aftab Alam Can a government organization change its service rules to alter the promotion channels for its employees? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a case involving the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board (TNEB) and its

Supreme Court Upholds Policy Decision on Promotion Channels for Technical Staff: T.N. Electricity Board vs. T.N. Electricity Board Thozhilalar Aykkiya Sangam (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top