Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Director at CSI Institute Affiliated with JNT University: P.J. Dharmaraj vs. Church of South India & Ors. (2024) INSC 938 (6 December 2024)

/ Constitutional Law, Retirement Age, Service Law, Service Law with G.O.Ms.No.40, Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Director at CSI Institute Affiliated with JNT University LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the enhanced retirement age of 65 years for teachers in technical institutions, as per amended AICTE and UGC regulations, automatically applies to a Director of an affiliated institute when the state government and affiliating university have […]

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Director at CSI Institute Affiliated with JNT University: P.J. Dharmaraj vs. Church of South India & Ors. (2024) INSC 938 (6 December 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Dismissal in SBI Employee Case: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Krishna Murari, Retrospective Dismissal, Service Law, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules with Rule 19, Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Dismissal in SBI Employee Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a bank must take affirmative action to continue disciplinary proceedings against an employee who reaches superannuation during the proceedings. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad Judgment Date: 9 January 2023 Introduction Date of

Supreme Court Upholds Retrospective Dismissal in SBI Employee Case: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023)

/ Bela M. Trivedi, Disciplinary Proceedings, Judges, Krishna Murari, Retirement, Service Law, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992, State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992 with Rule 19(1), State Bank of India Officer Service Rules, 1992 with Rule 19(3), Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Appointing Authority of a bank can dismiss an employee after the employee has attained superannuation, when disciplinary proceedings were initiated before superannuation. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: State Bank of India & Ors. vs.

Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Bank Officer: State Bank of India vs. Kamal Kishore Prasad (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights, Modifies High Court Order on Retirement Age: M.L. Patil vs. State of Goa (20 May 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Retirement Age, Service Law, Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights, Modifies High Court Order on Retirement Age: M.L. Patil vs. State of Goa (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether retirees are entitled to full pension benefits from the date they reach the correct retirement age, despite delays in filing legal challenges. CASE TYPE: Service Law – Pension Benefits Case Name: Shri M.L.

Supreme Court Upholds Pension Rights, Modifies High Court Order on Retirement Age: M.L. Patil vs. State of Goa (20 May 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles enhanced superannuation benefits for aided college teachers in Dr. Jacob Thudipara vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (21 April 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Government Aided Institutions, Judges, M.R. Shah, Retirement Benefits, Service Law, Superannuation

Supreme Court Rules on Enhanced Superannuation for Aided College Teachers Date of the Judgment: 21 April 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 2974 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can teachers in government-aided private colleges receive the same enhanced retirement age benefits as their counterparts in government colleges? The Supreme Court of

Supreme Court settles enhanced superannuation benefits for aided college teachers in Dr. Jacob Thudipara vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (21 April 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles superannuation date for teachers: Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020) INSC 752 (16 October 2020)

/ Judges, S. Ravindra Bhat, Service Law, Superannuation, Uday Umesh Lalit, University Statutes

Supreme Court Clarifies Teacher Superannuation Rules in Kumaun University Case LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of university statutes regarding the date of superannuation for teachers. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs. State of Uttarakhand [Judgment Date]: 16 October 2020 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 16 October 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 752 Judges: Uday

Supreme Court settles superannuation date for teachers: Navin Chandra Dhoundiyal vs. State of Uttarakhand (2020) INSC 752 (16 October 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Medical Faculty: Chandra Mohan Varma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Extension of Service, Judges, Retirement Age, Service Law, Superannuation

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Medical Faculty: Chandra Mohan Varma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a government notification increasing the retirement age applies to employees already granted an extension of service. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: Chandra Mohan Varma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors. [Judgment

Supreme Court Upholds Retirement Age of 60 for Medical Faculty: Chandra Mohan Varma vs. State of Uttar Pradesh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies “consequential benefits” in superannuation cases: K. Ananda Rao vs. Sri S.S. Rawat (2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, M.R. Shah, Service Law, Service Law with Andhra Pradesh Public Employment Act, 1984, Superannuation, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court clarifies “consequential benefits” in superannuation cases: K. Ananda Rao vs. Sri S.S. Rawat (2019) Date of the Judgment: March 7, 2019 Judges: Uday Umesh Lalit, J. and M.R. Shah, J. Citation: Not Available What exactly do “consequential benefits” mean when a government employee’s retirement age is increased? The Supreme Court of India recently

Supreme Court clarifies “consequential benefits” in superannuation cases: K. Ananda Rao vs. Sri S.S. Rawat (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs lump sum payment to PWD worker in lieu of reinstatement: The Chief Engineer vs. S. Patrajan (20 September 2018)

/ Abhay Manohar Sapre, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Judges, Reinstatement, Remedies under Industrial Disputes Act, S. Abdul Nazeer, Service Law, Superannuation, Temporary Employees

Supreme Court directs lump sum payment to PWD worker in lieu of reinstatement: The Chief Engineer vs. S. Patrajan (2018) Date of the Judgment: 20 September 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Abhay Manohar Sapre, J., S. Abdul Nazeer, J. Can a long-serving temporary worker be denied compensation after their services are discontinued? The Supreme Court

Supreme Court directs lump sum payment to PWD worker in lieu of reinstatement: The Chief Engineer vs. S. Patrajan (20 September 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top