Suspension

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Pending Criminal Case: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti (2022)

/ Civil Procedure Code, Civil Procedure Code with Order 41 Rule 33, Disciplinary Proceedings, Dismissal, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 13, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 with Section 7, Service Law, Suspension

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Pending Criminal Case: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether disciplinary proceedings should be stayed due to a pending criminal case involving the same charges and evidence. CASE TYPE: Service Law, Disciplinary Proceedings Case Name: Eastern Coalfields Limited & Ors. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti Judgment […]

Supreme Court Upholds Disciplinary Proceedings Despite Pending Criminal Case: Eastern Coalfields Ltd. vs. Rabindra Kumar Bharti (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Full Salary for Suspension Period After Penalty Reduction in Bank Employee Case (14 January 2020)

/ Back Wages, Disciplinary Proceedings, Hemant Gupta, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Muzaffarnagar Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Modified) Officer and Staff Services Regulations, 2010, Muzaffarnagar Kshetriya Gramin Bank (Modified) Officer and Staff Services Regulations, 2010 with Regulation 38 (kha) (4), Regulation 38 (kha) (4), Service Law, Suspension

Supreme Court Denies Full Salary for Suspension Period After Penalty Reduction in Bank Employee Case LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an employee is entitled to full salary for the suspension period when the initial dismissal order is reduced to a lesser penalty. CASE TYPE: Service Law Case Name: Om Pal Singh vs. Disciplinary Authority & Ors. Judgment

Supreme Court Denies Full Salary for Suspension Period After Penalty Reduction in Bank Employee Case (14 January 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies back wages for suspended employee acquitted of criminal charges: Raj Narain vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 264 (01 April 2019)

/ Back Wages, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 409, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 420, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 467, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M.R. Shah, Reinstatement, Service Law, Suspension

Supreme Court Clarifies Back Wages for Suspended Employee Acquitted of Criminal Charges Date of the Judgment: 01 April 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 264 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J. and M.R. Shah, J. Can an employee who was suspended due to criminal charges and later acquitted claim full back wages for the entire suspension period? The

Supreme Court clarifies back wages for suspended employee acquitted of criminal charges: Raj Narain vs. Union of India (2019) INSC 264 (01 April 2019) Read Post »

Railway Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court clarifies principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings (28th May 2009)

/ B.S. Chauhan, Judges, Mukundakam Sharma, Railway Service Conduct Rules, 1966, Retiral Benefits, Reversion, Rule 3(i)(ii), Railway Service Conduct Rules, 1966, Rule 3(i)(iii), Railway Service Conduct Rules, 1966, Service Law, Suspension

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 28th May 2009 Citation: Where available, provide the case citation in the Indian Supreme Court (INSC) format. Judges: Hon’ble Dr. Justice Mukundakam Sharma, Hon’ble Dr. Justice B.S. Chauhan Can a disciplinary inquiry be sustained on vague charges? The Supreme Court in Union of India & Ors. vs. Gyan Chand Chattar

Railway Employee Misconduct: Supreme Court clarifies principles of natural justice in disciplinary proceedings (28th May 2009) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies subsistence allowance during suspension when CBI investigates: Punjab National Bank vs. Bernard Lakra (2008)

/ Awards and Settlements, Departmental Enquiry, Desai Award, Industrial Disputes Act, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R.V. Raveendran, Sastry Award, Service Law, Subsistence Allowance, Suspension

Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 18, 2008 Judges: Justice R.V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta When an employee is suspended pending investigation, how much subsistence allowance are they entitled to? The Supreme Court in Punjab National Bank & Anr. vs. Bernard Lakra addressed a dispute regarding the appropriate subsistence allowance for an employee

Supreme Court clarifies subsistence allowance during suspension when CBI investigates: Punjab National Bank vs. Bernard Lakra (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top