Tribunal Appointments

Supreme Court Directs Reconsideration of ITAT Appointments: Advocate Association Bengaluru vs. Anoop Kumar Mendiratta (2022)

/ A M Khanwilkar, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Income Tax Act, 1961, Income Tax Act, 1961 with Section 270A, Judges, Judicial Review, Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Search-cum-Selection Committee, Service Law, Tribunal Appointments, Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021, Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 with Section 3(7)

Supreme Court Directs Reconsideration of ITAT Appointments: Advocate Association Bengaluru vs. Anoop Kumar Mendiratta (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) can rely on feedback received after the Search-cum-Selection Committee (SCSC) recommendations without referring it back to the SCSC. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Contempt Case Name: Advocate Association Bengaluru vs. Anoop Kumar […]

Supreme Court Directs Reconsideration of ITAT Appointments: Advocate Association Bengaluru vs. Anoop Kumar Mendiratta (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overrules Key Aspects of Finance Act 2017 on Tribunal Appointments and Powers: Rojer Mathew vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. (2019) INSC 877 (13 November 2019)

/ Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 110, Constitutional Law with Article 323A, Deepak Gupta, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Finance Act, 2017, Finance Act, 2017 with Section 184, Judges, N.V. Ramana, Ranjan Gogoi, Sanjiv Khanna, Separation of Powers, Tribunal Appointments

Supreme Court Overrules Key Aspects of Finance Act 2017 on Tribunal Appointments and Powers LEGAL ISSUE: Constitutionality of the Finance Act, 2017, specifically regarding tribunal appointments and powers. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Tribunal Law Case Name: Rojer Mathew vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. & Ors. Judgment Date: 13 November 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Overrules Key Aspects of Finance Act 2017 on Tribunal Appointments and Powers: Rojer Mathew vs. South Indian Bank Ltd. (2019) INSC 877 (13 November 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Tribunal Appointments Process Amidst Ongoing Litigation

/ A. M. Khanwilkar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Writ Petitions, D. Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Judges, Service Law, Service Law with Rules of 2017, Tribunal Appointments

Supreme Court Clarifies Tribunal Appointments Process Amidst Ongoing Litigation Date of the Judgment: February 22, 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 137 Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A. M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr. D. Y. Chandrachud, J The Supreme Court addressed the complexities surrounding the appointment of members to various tribunals in India. This order clarifies the interim directions

Supreme Court Clarifies Tribunal Appointments Process Amidst Ongoing Litigation Read Post »

Scroll to Top