Societies Registration Act, 1860

Supreme Court settles the status of ad-hoc employees in Sports Authority of India: Sports Authority of India & Anr. vs. Dr. Kulbir Singh Rana (2025) INSC 319 (04 March 2025)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Judges, Recruitment Rules, Service Law, Service Rules and Regulations, Societies Registration Act, 1860, Sudhanshu Dhulia

Introduction Date of the Judgment: 04 March 2025 Citation: (2025) INSC 319 Judges: Sudhanshu Dhulia, J., Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. What happens to employees who are hired on an ad-hoc basis when new rules come into effect? The Supreme Court of India addressed this important question in a recent case involving the Sports Authority of India […]

Supreme Court settles the status of ad-hoc employees in Sports Authority of India: Sports Authority of India & Anr. vs. Dr. Kulbir Singh Rana (2025) INSC 319 (04 March 2025) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Election of Society’s Executive Body Despite Notice Issue: Adv. Babasaheb Wasade vs. Manohar Gangadhar Muddeshwar (2024)

/ Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, Doctrine of Necessity, Emergency Powers, Membership Rights, Public Trust Management, Societies Registration Act, 1860, Societies Registration Act, 1860 with Section 15

Supreme Court Upholds Election of Society’s Executive Body Despite Notice Issue: Adv. Babasaheb Wasade vs. Manohar Gangadhar Muddeshwar (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a Working President of a Society can convene an election meeting and whether members in arrears of subscription are entitled to notice for such meetings. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal related to Society and

Supreme Court Upholds Election of Society’s Executive Body Despite Notice Issue: Adv. Babasaheb Wasade vs. Manohar Gangadhar Muddeshwar (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Waqf Board Certificate, Settles Mosque Management Dispute: P. Nazeer vs. Salafi Trust (2022)

/ Hemant Gupta, Judges, Revisional Jurisdiction, Societies Registration Act, 1860, Societies Registration Act, 1860 with Section 6, V. Ramasubramanian, Waqf Act, 1995, Waqf Act, 1995 with Section 36, Waqf Management

Supreme Court Upholds Waqf Board Certificate, Settles Mosque Management Dispute: P. Nazeer vs. Salafi Trust (2022) Date of the Judgment: March 30, 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 299 Judges: Hemant Gupta, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a local mosque committee claim management rights over a mosque if the land is owned by a registered Waqf Trust?

Supreme Court Upholds Waqf Board Certificate, Settles Mosque Management Dispute: P. Nazeer vs. Salafi Trust (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022)

/ Autonomy of Societies, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Judges, M.R. Shah, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Societies Registration Act, 1860, State Government Employees

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of an autonomous body are entitled to pensionary benefits on par with State Government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Bhagwan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 January 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022)

/ Autonomous Bodies, B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 14, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Fundamental Rights, Judges, M.R. Shah, Parity in Service, Pension Benefits, Service Law, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether employees of an autonomous body are entitled to pensionary benefits on par with state government employees. CASE TYPE: Service Law. Case Name: The State of Maharashtra & Anr. vs. Bhagwan & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 10 January 2022 Introduction

Supreme Court Denies Pension Parity for WALMI Employees: State of Maharashtra vs. Bhagwan (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Stays Inquiry into Private Conversation in PIL: Justice V. Eswaraiah vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Procedure, Interlocutory Applications, Judges, Judicial Inquiry, Maintainability of PIL, Principles of Natural Justice, Procedural Fairness, Public Interest Litigation, R. Subhash Reddy, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Supreme Court Stays Inquiry into Private Conversation in PIL: Justice V. Eswaraiah vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order an inquiry into a private conversation in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) when the conversation is not directly related to the main issue of the PIL. CASE TYPE: Public Interest

Supreme Court Stays Inquiry into Private Conversation in PIL: Justice V. Eswaraiah vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds RIMS Director Appointment Rules: Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh vs. Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh (2020)

/ Administrative Law, Judges, Judicial Review, R. Banumathi, R. Subhash Reddy, Recruitment Rules, Rules and Regulations of Society, Service Law, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Supreme Court Upholds RIMS Director Appointment Rules: Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh vs. Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Validity of recruitment rules for the post of Director at the Regional Institute of Medical Sciences (RIMS), Imphal, and the High Court’s interference in the absence of a direct challenge to the rules. CASE TYPE: Service

Supreme Court Upholds RIMS Director Appointment Rules: Dr. Thingujam Achouba Singh vs. Dr. H. Nabachandra Singh (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Khata: Lakshmamma vs. Bangalore Development Authority (2018)

/ Arun Mishra, Bangalore Development Authority Act, Bangalore Development Authority Act with order dated 17.09.2003, Co-operative Societies Act, Co-operative Societies Act with Registrar's order dated 02.01.1997, Judges, Khata Restoration, Membership Rights, Navin Sinha

Supreme Court Restores Khata: Lakshmamma vs. Bangalore Development Authority (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a “khata” (property registration document) can be denied to a purchaser of land from a Scheduled Caste Co-operative Society, if the purchaser does not belong to the Scheduled Caste, despite prior orders protecting the allotment. CASE TYPE: Civil, Land Law Case Name:

Supreme Court Restores Khata: Lakshmamma vs. Bangalore Development Authority (2018) Read Post »

Regularization of Daily Wage Workers: Supreme Court clarifies applicability of State Government policies in Haryana Rajya Sainik Board vs. Mohan Lal (2008)

/ Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 with Section 25-F, Judges, Lokeshwar Singh Panta, R. V. Raveendran, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Date of the Judgment: September 11, 2008 Judges: Justice R. V. Raveendran and Justice Lokeshwar Singh Panta Can a social welfare organization be compelled to regularize a daily wage employee based on State Government policies? The Supreme Court addressed this question in the case of Haryana Rajya Sainik Board-cum-Defence & Security Relief Fund & Member

Regularization of Daily Wage Workers: Supreme Court clarifies applicability of State Government policies in Haryana Rajya Sainik Board vs. Mohan Lal (2008) Read Post »

Scroll to Top