Specific Relief Act, 1963

Supreme Court Overturns Specific Performance Decree in Property Sale Dispute: U.N. Krishnamurthy vs. A.M. Krishnamurthy (2022)

/ Hrishikesh Roy, Indira Banerjee, Judges, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 16(c)

Supreme Court Overturns Specific Performance Decree in Property Sale Dispute: U.N. Krishnamurthy vs. A.M. Krishnamurthy (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the plaintiff demonstrated continuous readiness and willingness to perform their obligations in a contract for the sale of property, a prerequisite for specific performance. CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance of Contract) Case Name: U.N. Krishnamurthy (Since […]

Supreme Court Overturns Specific Performance Decree in Property Sale Dispute: U.N. Krishnamurthy vs. A.M. Krishnamurthy (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Consent Decree in Property Dispute: Hemantha Kumar vs. R. Mahadevaiah (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXIII Rule 3, Compromise of suits, Judges, M.R. Shah, Property Law, Sale Agreement, Specific Performance

Supreme Court Restores Consent Decree in Property Dispute: Hemantha Kumar vs. R. Mahadevaiah (2022) Date of the Judgment: July 11, 2022 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 4108 of 2022 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and B.V. Nagarathna, J. Can a consent decree, agreed upon by all parties and initially approved by a trial court, be overturned simply

Supreme Court Restores Consent Decree in Property Dispute: Hemantha Kumar vs. R. Mahadevaiah (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Orders Additional Payment: Satnam Singh vs. Satnam Singh (2022)

/ Agreement to Sell, Ajay Rastogi, Bela M. Trivedi, Contract Law, Judges, Specific Performance of Contract, Specific Relief Act, 1963

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Orders Additional Payment: Satnam Singh vs. Satnam Singh (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell should be upheld, and what considerations should be made regarding the payment of the sale consideration when there is a significant time lapse between

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell, Orders Additional Payment: Satnam Singh vs. Satnam Singh (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree in Property Dispute: Nagendra vs. Ashok (2022)

/ Civil Law, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order 47, Judges, K. M. Joseph, Specific Performance, Uday Umesh Lalit

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree in Property Dispute: Nagendra vs. Ashok (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance of a property sale can be upheld despite challenges in higher courts. CASE TYPE: Civil – Specific Performance Case Name: Nagendra vs. Ashok and Anr. Judgment Date: April 20, 2022 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree in Property Dispute: Nagendra vs. Ashok (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell: P. Ramasubbamma vs. V. Vijayalakshmi & Ors. (2022)

/ Agreement to Sell, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, M.R. Shah, Specific Performance of Contract, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 20

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell: P. Ramasubbamma vs. V. Vijayalakshmi & Ors. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance of an agreement to sell can be granted when a subsequent sale deed has been executed, and whether it is necessary to seek cancellation of the subsequent sale deed in

Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell: P. Ramasubbamma vs. V. Vijayalakshmi & Ors. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Road Project Completion, Emphasizes Minimal Interference in Tenders: N.G. Projects vs. Vinod Kumar Jain (21 March 2022)

/ Contract Law, Hemant Gupta, Judges, Judicial Review in Contract Matters, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 41(ha), Tender Process, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Allows Road Project Completion, Emphasizes Minimal Interference in Tenders: N.G. Projects vs. Vinod Kumar Jain (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can interfere with a tender process and halt an infrastructure project based on minor deviations in bid documents. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Infrastructure Development, Tender Process. Case Name: M/S. N.G. Projects

Supreme Court Allows Road Project Completion, Emphasizes Minimal Interference in Tenders: N.G. Projects vs. Vinod Kumar Jain (21 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Bangalore Development Authority’s Right to Alter Site Prices: Bangalore Development Authority vs. R. Jayakumar & Ors. (9 March 2022)

/ Allotment of Sites, Bangalore Development Authority Rules, 1984, Bangalore Development Authority Rules, 1984 with Rule 12, Bela M. Trivedi, Breach of contract, Contract Law, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Specific Performance

Supreme Court Upholds Bangalore Development Authority’s Right to Alter Site Prices: Bangalore Development Authority vs. R. Jayakumar & Ors. (2022) Date of the Judgment: 9 March 2022 Citation: Not Available Judges: Sanjiv Khanna, J. and Bela M. Trivedi, J. Can a development authority alter the price of a site after the initial application? The Supreme

Supreme Court Upholds Bangalore Development Authority’s Right to Alter Site Prices: Bangalore Development Authority vs. R. Jayakumar & Ors. (9 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Interim Injunction in Film Rights Dispute: Narendra Hirawat & Co. vs. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2022)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Breach of contract, Contract Act, Judges, Specific Performance, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 14(d), Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Restores Interim Injunction in Film Rights Dispute: Narendra Hirawat & Co. vs. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether an appellate court should interfere with a trial court’s order granting an interim injunction when the trial court’s decision was reasonable and judicially sound. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Intellectual Property Rights Case

Supreme Court Restores Interim Injunction in Film Rights Dispute: Narendra Hirawat & Co. vs. Sholay Media Entertainment Pvt. Ltd. (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restrains Injunction Against True Owner: Padhiyar Prahladji Chenaji vs. Maniben Jagmalbhai (2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Civil Law, Injunction, Judges, M.R. Shah, Property Law, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 38, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 41, Title Dispute

Supreme Court Restrains Injunction Against True Owner: Padhiyar Prahladji Chenaji vs. Maniben Jagmalbhai (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person who has lost a title dispute can still obtain an injunction against the true owner of the property. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Padhiyar Prahladji Chenaji (Deceased) Through L.R.s vs. Maniben Jagmalbhai (Deceased) Through L.R.s and

Supreme Court Restrains Injunction Against True Owner: Padhiyar Prahladji Chenaji vs. Maniben Jagmalbhai (2022) Read Post »

Specific Performance Denied: Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delayed Claim in Land Dispute: Surjeet Singh Sahni vs. State of U.P. (28 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Law, Delay and Laches, Judges, M.R. Shah, Specific Performance, U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976, U.P. Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 with Section 6

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea for Specific Performance After Delay: Surjeet Singh Sahni vs. State of U.P. (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a writ petition seeking specific performance of a contract is maintainable after a significant delay and whether a fresh cause of action arises from the rejection of a belated representation. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Land

Specific Performance Denied: Supreme Court Upholds Dismissal of Delayed Claim in Land Dispute: Surjeet Singh Sahni vs. State of U.P. (28 February 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for executing sale deed in specific performance decree: Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan (2022) INSC 178

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Execution of Decree, Hrishikesh Roy, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Order XXI Rule 34, Specific Performance

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for executing sale deed in specific performance decree: Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan (2022) INSC 178 LEGAL ISSUE: What is the correct procedure for executing a sale deed in a decree for specific performance? CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance) Case Name: Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan & Anr. [Judgment Date]: 28 February 2022

Supreme Court clarifies procedure for executing sale deed in specific performance decree: Rajbir vs. Suraj Bhan (2022) INSC 178 Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on work contract: Municipal Council Gondia vs. Divi Works & Suppliers (28 February 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Breach of contract, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Contract Law, Judges, M. R. Shah, Specific Performance, Work Order, Writ Jurisdiction

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on work contract: Municipal Council Gondia vs. Divi Works & Suppliers (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can issue a writ of mandamus for specific performance of a contract in a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Writ Jurisdiction Case

Supreme Court overturns High Court order on work contract: Municipal Council Gondia vs. Divi Works & Suppliers (28 February 2022) Read Post »

Scroll to Top