Supreme Court on Readiness and Willingness in Specific Performance Suits: Ravi Setia vs. Madan Lal (2019) Date of the Judgment: October 4, 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: Navin Sinha, J., Indira Banerjee, J. Can a party seeking specific performance of a contract be denied relief if they fail to demonstrate continuous readiness and […]
Supreme Court overturns Specific Performance Decree due to lack of Readiness and Willingness: Mohinder Kaur vs. Sant Paul Singh (2019) Date of the Judgment: October 1, 2019 Citation: Not Available Judges: Navin Sinha, J. and Indira Banerjee, J. Can a suit for specific performance be decreed if the plaintiff fails to demonstrate their readiness and
Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance for Lack of Proven Financial Readiness: Ritu Saxena vs. J.S. Grover (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a plaintiff seeking specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property has demonstrated sufficient readiness and willingness to perform their part of the contract, particularly regarding financial capacity. CASE TYPE: Civil (Specific Performance)
Supreme Court Upholds Housing Board’s Allotment Price After Acceptance: Bihar State Housing Board vs. Radha Ballabh Health Care (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can dispute an allotment price after accepting it multiple times and entering into a formal agreement. CASE TYPE: Real Estate/Contract Law Case Name: The Bihar State Housing Board & Ors. vs.
Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance to Vendee for Non-Payment of Rent: Surinder Kaur vs. Bahadur Singh (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a vendee who fails to fulfill a promise in a contract can be granted specific performance of that contract. CASE TYPE: Contract Law, Specific Performance Case Name: Surinder Kaur (D) Thr. Lr. Jasinderjit Singh (D)
Supreme Court Clarifies Execution of Specific Performance Decrees After Appeal: Surinder Pal Soni vs. Sohan Lal (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance from a trial court merges with the decree of the appellate court, and if so, what impact it has on the execution of the decree, particularly concerning time limits for
Supreme Court Upholds Plaintiff’s Right to Choose Parties in Specific Performance Suit Date of the Judgment: July 17, 2019 Citation: Civil Appeal Nos. 5522-5523 of 2019 Judges: Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J., M.R. Shah, J. Can a third party, who purchased a property during the pendency of a suit for specific performance, be added as a
Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance Decree Despite Lack of Vakalatnama: Shree Chaitanya Constructions vs. Sudhir Poonamchand Parakh & Ors. (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance can be set aside solely on the ground that the advocate who appeared on behalf of a party did not have a written Vakalatnama, especially when the
Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Sale Agreement: R Lakshmikantham vs Devaraji (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether time was of the essence in a sale agreement and whether the plaintiff was ready and willing to perform his part of the contract. CASE TYPE: Civil – Specific Performance of Contract Case Name: R Lakshmikantham vs Devaraji [Judgment
Supreme Court Resolves Allotment of Market Gala: Hande Wavare & Co. vs. Ramchandra Vitthal Dongre (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a person can claim allotment of a market gala based on a transfer of booking amount from another person, and the process for allotting market galas when multiple claimants are eligible. CASE TYPE: Civil – Market
Supreme Court Upholds Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell: Beemaneni Maha Lakshmi vs. Gangumalla Appa Rao (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a decree for specific performance of a sale agreement can be granted when the vendor fails to fulfill their obligations under the agreement. CASE TYPE: Civil – Specific Performance Case Name: Beemaneni Maha Lakshmi vs.
Supreme Court Denies Specific Performance, Orders Refund in Property Sale Dispute: Ravankar vs. Raikar (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether specific performance of a sale agreement should be granted when the buyer fails to prove readiness and willingness to perform their part of the contract and has not provided sufficient evidence of payments made beyond the initial
