Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Right to Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act: Sanjay Maruti Jadhav & Anr. vs. Amit Tatoba Sawant (26 April 2024)

/ Illegal Dispossession, Possessory Rights, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Right to Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act Date of the Judgment: 26 April 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 345 Judges: Vikram Nath, J. and Satish Chandra Sharma, J. Can a person who has been illegally evicted from a property regain possession through legal means? The Supreme Court […]

Supreme Court Upholds Tenant’s Right to Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act: Sanjay Maruti Jadhav & Anr. vs. Amit Tatoba Sawant (26 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Possessory Rights in Property Dispute: Shivshankara vs. Vedavyasa (2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, C.T. Ravikumar, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLI Rule 27, Judges, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 6, Transfer of Property Act, 1882, Transfer of Property Act, 1882 with Section 52

Supreme Court Upholds Possessory Rights in Property Dispute: Shivshankara vs. Vedavyasa (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether prior possession can be the basis of a claim for recovery of possession against a dispossessor who does not have a better title. CASE TYPE: Civil Property Dispute Case Name: Shivshankara & Anr. vs. H.P. Vedavyasa Char [Judgment Date]: March

Supreme Court Upholds Possessory Rights in Property Dispute: Shivshankara vs. Vedavyasa (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Established Possession: A.Subramanian vs. R. Pannerselvam (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Law, Injunction, Judges, M.R. Shah, Property Law, R. Subhash Reddy, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 6

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Established Possession: A.Subramanian vs. R. Pannerselvam (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a suit for permanent injunction can be decreed solely based on the plaintiff’s established possession, without delving into the complexities of title, especially when the defendant has previously failed in litigation concerning the same property. CASE TYPE: Civil Law

Supreme Court Upholds Injunction Based on Established Possession: A.Subramanian vs. R. Pannerselvam (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores Status Quo in Property Dispute: Tek Singh vs. Shashi Verma (2019)

/ Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 115, Interlocutory Orders, Judges, R.F. Nariman, Revisional Jurisdiction, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Specific Relief Act, 1963 with Section 6, Vineet Saran

Supreme Court Restores Status Quo in Property Dispute: Tek Singh vs. Shashi Verma (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court can interfere with concurrent findings of fact in a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) when the order is interlocutory in nature. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Tek Singh

Supreme Court Restores Status Quo in Property Dispute: Tek Singh vs. Shashi Verma (2019) Read Post »

Scroll to Top