Civil Appeals

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021)

/ Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR), Civil Appeals, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Supreme Court Judgments, Telecom Law, Telecom Regulatory

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clerical or arithmetical errors in the calculation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues can be rectified despite a previous Supreme Court order prohibiting reassessment. CASE TYPE: Telecom Regulatory/Civil Case Name: Union […]

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Overturns Contributory Negligence in Motor Accident Case: Jumani Begam vs. Ram Narayan (2019)

/ Ajay Rastogi, Civil Appeals, Compensation for Motor Accident, Contributory Negligence, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 with Section 166, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Overturns Contributory Negligence in Motor Accident Case: Jumani Begam vs. Ram Narayan (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the High Court was correct in upholding the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal’s (MACT) finding of contributory negligence in a case where a truck was parked without reflectors on the road at night, leading to a fatal accident.

Supreme Court Overturns Contributory Negligence in Motor Accident Case: Jumani Begam vs. Ram Narayan (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Appeals, Civil Law, Judges, Land Dispute, Navin Sinha, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the appeal should be dismissed based on the reasons provided in a related case. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Rajesh s/o Shrirambapu Fate vs. State of Maharashtra & ors. Judgment Date: 19 July 2019 Introduction Date of the

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Dispute Case: Rajesh vs. State of Maharashtra (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Settles Family Property Dispute Through Mediation: Ravinder Kaur vs. Gagandeep Singh (2018)

/ Alternative Dispute Resolution, Civil Appeals, Civil Law, Family Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Mediation, Property Disputes, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Settlement

Supreme Court Settles Family Property Dispute Through Mediation: Ravinder Kaur vs. Gagandeep Singh (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Resolution of family property disputes through mediation. CASE TYPE: Civil, Family Property Dispute. Case Name: Ravinder Kaur vs. Gagandeep Singh [Judgment Date]: September 06, 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment: September 06, 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Justice Kurian

Supreme Court Settles Family Property Dispute Through Mediation: Ravinder Kaur vs. Gagandeep Singh (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Land Acquisition Appeals in Line with Rajbir Judgment: Sarup Singh vs. State of Haryana (18 July 2018)

/ Civil Appeals, Civil Law, Compensation, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sanjay Kishan Kaul

Supreme Court Disposes of Land Acquisition Appeals: Sarup Singh vs. State of Haryana (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Land acquisition compensation and related matters. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeals related to land acquisition. Case Name: Sarup Singh ETC. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC. Judgment Date: 18 July 2018 Date of the Judgment: 18 July 2018 Citation:

Supreme Court Disposes of Land Acquisition Appeals in Line with Rajbir Judgment: Sarup Singh vs. State of Haryana (18 July 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court disposes of service age claim: Matta Anand Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (22 September 2017)

/ 2017 Judgments, Civil Appeals, Judges, Judicial Consistency, Kurian Joseph, Precedent, R. Banumathi, Retirement Age, Service Age, Service Law, Supreme Court Judgments

Can an employee’s claim for extended service be automatically resolved by a prior, similar judgment? The Supreme Court of India addressed this in the case of Matta Anand Kumar v. The State of Andhra Pradesh. This case deals with a claim for continued service up to 60 years of age. The court disposed of the

Supreme Court disposes of service age claim: Matta Anand Kumar vs. State of Andhra Pradesh (22 September 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court ensures uniform compensation in land acquisition cases: Munshiya vs. State of U.P. (2017)

/ Civil Appeals, Civil Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Land Acquisition, R. Banumathi

Can land owners receive different compensation for land acquired under the same notification? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this issue in a case concerning land acquisition compensation. The court emphasized the need for uniformity in compensation for land acquired under the same notification. This judgment ensures that landowners receive equal treatment. Citation: (2017)

Supreme Court ensures uniform compensation in land acquisition cases: Munshiya vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Pollution Control Case: Maharashtra State Pollution Control Board vs. Shailesh Navekar (2013)

/ Civil Appeals, Civil Procedure, Environmental Law, H.L. Dattu, Jagdish Singh Khehar, Judges, Pollution Control

Date of the Judgment: May 10, 2013 Judges: Justice H.L. Dattu and Justice Jagdish Singh Khehar Can appeals be dismissed without a detailed judgment? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question by dismissing two civil appeals related to a pollution control matter. This blog post summarizes the key aspects of the case, focusing

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Pollution Control Case: Maharashtra State Pollution Control Board vs. Shailesh Navekar (2013) Read Post »

Scroll to Top