Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Addresses Various Applications in Karnataka Mining Case (03 April 2024)

/ Guarantee Money, Mining Law, Mining Leases, Orders of the Supreme Court, Reclamation and Rehabilitation Plans, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Addresses Various Applications in Karnataka Mining Case (03 April 2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Review and disposal of various interlocutory applications related to mining activities in Karnataka. CASE TYPE: Mining Law, Public Interest Litigation Case Name: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 03 April 2024 Date of the […]

Supreme Court Addresses Various Applications in Karnataka Mining Case (03 April 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Disclosure of Electoral Bond Data: Association of Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (2024)

/ Association of Democratic Reforms vs Union of India, Constitutional Law, Election Commission of India, Election Law, Electoral Bonds, Judicial Orders, Right to Information, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Directs Disclosure of Electoral Bond Data: Association of Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Disclosure of Electoral Bond Data CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law/Election Law Case Name: Association of Democratic Reforms and Another vs. Union of India and Others [Judgment Date]: March 15, 2024 Date of the Judgment: March 15, 2024

Supreme Court Directs Disclosure of Electoral Bond Data: Association of Democratic Reforms vs. Union of India (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders 12% Interest on Coal Refund: M/S. Domco Smokeless Fuels Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Jharkhand (22 February 2024)

/ Contempt of Court, Contract Law, Directions, Interest, Orders, Refund, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Orders 12% Interest on Coal Refund: M/S. Domco Smokeless Fuels Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Jharkhand (2024) Date of the Judgment: 22 February 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 133 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J. and Sandeep Mehta, J. Can a company be denied a refund of excess payment for coal, along with interest, despite previous

Supreme Court Orders 12% Interest on Coal Refund: M/S. Domco Smokeless Fuels Pvt. Ltd. vs. State of Jharkhand (22 February 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in Murder Case: Velthepu Srinivas vs. State of Telangana (2024)

/ Case Analysis, Criminal Law, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 304 Part II, Offences Against Human Body, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in Murder Case: Velthepu Srinivas vs. State of Telangana (2024) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether all accused persons in a murder case can be convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) when their individual roles and intentions differ. CASE TYPE: Criminal Case Name: Velthepu Srinivas and

Supreme Court Modifies Conviction in Murder Case: Velthepu Srinivas vs. State of Telangana (2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Mandates Hybrid Hearings in All Courts and Tribunals: Sarvesh Mathur vs. Registrar General, High Court of Punjab and Haryana (2023) INSC 891 (October 6, 2023)

/ Access to Justice, Constitutional Law, Fundamental Rights, High Courts, Judiciary, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Mandates Hybrid Hearings in All Courts and Tribunals Date of the Judgment: October 6, 2023 Citation: (2023) INSC 891 Judges: Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI, J B Pardiwala, J, Manoj Misra, J Can technology bridge the gap in access to justice? The Supreme Court of India, in a significant move, has mandated that

Supreme Court Mandates Hybrid Hearings in All Courts and Tribunals: Sarvesh Mathur vs. Registrar General, High Court of Punjab and Haryana (2023) INSC 891 (October 6, 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Order Allowing Unconditional Withdrawal of Funds in Jermyn Capital Case (17 May 2023)

/ Civil Procedure, Judges, Krishna Murari, Modification of Court Order, Order Modification, Sanjay Kumar, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Modifies Order on Withdrawal of Funds in Jermyn Capital Case Date of the Judgment: 17 May 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 5472 Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Krishna Murari and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Can an order of the Supreme Court be modified to allow for the unconditional withdrawal of funds, previously subject to

Supreme Court Modifies Order Allowing Unconditional Withdrawal of Funds in Jermyn Capital Case (17 May 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Fine-Tunes Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2023)

/ Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 16, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate Designation

Supreme Court Fine-Tunes Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of guidelines for designation of Senior Advocates. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Advocates Act Case Name: Ms. Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India Judgment Date: 12 May 2023 Date of the Judgment: 12 May 2023 Citation: 2023

Supreme Court Fine-Tunes Senior Advocate Designation Process: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Senior Advocate Designation Guidelines: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2023)

/ Advocates Act, 1961, Advocates Act, 1961 with Section 16, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Aravind Kumar, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 32, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Senior Advocate Designation, Supreme Court of India, Supreme Court Rules, 2013

Supreme Court Modifies Senior Advocate Designation Guidelines: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of guidelines for designation of Senior Advocates. CASE TYPE: Constitutional Law, Advocates Act, 1961 Case Name: Ms. Indira Jaising v. Supreme Court of India, Through Secretary General Judgment Date: 12 May 2023 Date of the Judgment: 12

Supreme Court Modifies Senior Advocate Designation Guidelines: Indira Jaising vs. Supreme Court of India (2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Ban in Eco-Sensitive Zones: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (28 April 2023)

/ B.R. Gavai, Eco-Sensitive Zones, Environmental Law, Environmental Law with 2011 Guidelines, Environmental Law with ESZ Notifications, Judges, Supreme Court Judgments, Supreme Court of India, Supreme Court of India with Goa Foundation Vs. Union of India, Supreme Court of India with T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad Vs. Union of India, Vikram Nath

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Ban in Eco-Sensitive Zones: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on the extent of mining restrictions in Eco-Sensitive Zones (ESZ) around protected areas. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law. Case Name: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India. [Judgment Date]: 28 April 2023 Date of the Judgment: 28

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Ban in Eco-Sensitive Zones: T.N. Godavarman Thirumulpad vs. Union of India (28 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Grievance Redressal Committees for Advocates: District Bar Association Dehradun vs. Ishwar Shandilya (20 April 2023)

/ Advocate Issues, Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Bar Council of India, Bar Council of India with Affidavit dated 15.09.2021, Grievance Redressal Committees, Judges, M.R. Shah, Strikes by Lawyers, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Directs Grievance Redressal Committees for Advocates: District Bar Association Dehradun vs. Ishwar Shandilya (20 April 2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2023 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. Can strikes by lawyers be avoided by addressing their genuine grievances? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question by directing

Supreme Court Directs Grievance Redressal Committees for Advocates: District Bar Association Dehradun vs. Ishwar Shandilya (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Grievance Redressal Committees for Advocates: District Bar Association Dehradun vs. Ishwar Shandilya (20 April 2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Bar Council of India, Grievance Redressal Committees, Grievance Redressal Mechanism, Judges, Judicial System, M.R. Shah, Strikes and Boycotts

Supreme Court Directs Grievance Redressal Committees for Advocates: District Bar Association Dehradun vs. Ishwar Shandilya (20 April 2023) Date of the Judgment: 20 April 2023 Citation: 2023 INSC 405 Judges: M.R. Shah, J. and Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J. Can the frequent strikes and boycotts by advocates be controlled? The Supreme Court of India addressed this issue

Supreme Court Directs Grievance Redressal Committees for Advocates: District Bar Association Dehradun vs. Ishwar Shandilya (20 April 2023) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Hari Chand (2023)

/ Ahsanuddin Amanullah, Judges, Land Acquisition Act, 2013, Land Acquisition Act, 2013 with Section 24(2), M.R. Shah, Supreme Court Judgments on Land Acquisition, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Hari Chand (2023) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether land acquisition proceedings lapse if compensation is not paid, despite possession being taken. CASE TYPE: Land Acquisition Case Name: Land Acquisition Collector (South) vs. Hari Chand and Anr. [Judgment Date]: April 19, 2023 Introduction Date of the Judgment: April 19,

Supreme Court Upholds Land Acquisition: Land Acquisition Collector vs. Hari Chand (2023) Read Post »

Scroll to Top