Inherent Powers

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022)

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether to transfer petitions in matrimonial disputes from one family court to another. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute, Transfer Petition. Case Name: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka [Judgment Date]: September 5, 2022 Date of the

Supreme Court declines transfer of petitions in matrimonial dispute: Dr. Seema Sikka vs. Dr. Pranav Sikka (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Video Conferencing in Matrimonial Cases Due to Pandemic: Anjali Brahmawar Chauhan vs. Navin Chauhan (22 January 2021)

Supreme Court Allows Video Conferencing in Matrimonial Cases Due to Pandemic: Anjali Brahmawar Chauhan vs. Navin Chauhan (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether video conferencing can be allowed in matrimonial disputes. CASE TYPE: Matrimonial Dispute Case Name: Anjali Brahmawar Chauhan vs. Navin Chauhan Judgment Date: 22 January 2021 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 22 January 2021 Citation:

Supreme Court Allows Video Conferencing in Matrimonial Cases Due to Pandemic: Anjali Brahmawar Chauhan vs. Navin Chauhan (22 January 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases: Kantaru Rajeevaru vs. Indian Young Lawyers Association (2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases (2020) Date of the Judgment: 11 May 2020 Citation: Not Available Judges: S.A. Bobde, CJI, R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L. Nageswara Rao, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, S. Abdul Nazeer, R. Subhash Reddy, B.R. Gavai, and Surya Kant, JJ. This was a nine-judge bench. Can the Supreme

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases: Kantaru Rajeevaru vs. Indian Young Lawyers Association (2020) Read Post »

Scroll to Top