Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases: Kantaru Rajeevaru vs. Indian Young Lawyers Association (2020)

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases (2020) Date of the Judgment: 11 May 2020 Citation: Not Available Judges: S.A. Bobde, CJI, R. Banumathi, Ashok Bhushan, L. Nageswara Rao, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, S. Abdul Nazeer, R. Subhash Reddy, B.R. Gavai, and Surya Kant, JJ. This was a nine-judge bench. Can the Supreme […]

Supreme Court Clarifies Review Petition Scope in Religious Freedom Cases: Kantaru Rajeevaru vs. Indian Young Lawyers Association (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Banking Operations in Hamdard Laboratories Dispute: Hammad Ahmed vs. Abdul Majeed (2019) INSC 657 (09 July 2019)

Supreme Court Clarifies Banking Operations in Hamdard Laboratories Dispute LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of a previous Supreme Court order regarding the management of Hamdard Laboratories and its banking operations. CASE TYPE: Civil Dispute Case Name: Hammad Ahmed vs. Abdul Majeed and Ors. Judgment Date: 09 July 2019 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 09 July 2019 Citation:

Supreme Court Clarifies Banking Operations in Hamdard Laboratories Dispute: Hammad Ahmed vs. Abdul Majeed (2019) INSC 657 (09 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores NGT Case on Land Exchange: Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti vs. Union of India (2019)

Supreme Court Restores NGT Case on Land Exchange: Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) erred in disposing of an Original Application (OA) without considering objections after the Supreme Court had directed that the NGT should not hinder the appellant from pursuing remedies in

Supreme Court Restores NGT Case on Land Exchange: Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court recalls order for Super Bazar revival scheme: Super Bazar Karamchari Dalit Sangh vs. Union of India (26 September 2018)

Supreme Court recalls order for Super Bazar revival scheme: Super Bazar Karamchari Dalit Sangh vs. Union of India (2018) Date of the Judgment: 26 September 2018 Citation: Not Available Judges: Dipak Misra, CJI, A.M. Khanwilkar, J, Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. The judgment was authored by Dr. Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J. Can a court recall

Supreme Court recalls order for Super Bazar revival scheme: Super Bazar Karamchari Dalit Sangh vs. Union of India (26 September 2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Order on Municipal Contracts: Ujjain Corporation vs. BVG India Ltd. (2018)

Supreme Court Clarifies Order on Municipal Contracts: Ujjain Corporation vs. BVG India Ltd. (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Correction of a typographical error in a Supreme Court judgment. CASE TYPE: Civil Appeal. Case Name: Municipal Corporation, Ujjain & Anr. vs. BVG India Limited & Ors. [Judgment Date]: March 28, 2018 Date of the Judgment: March 28, 2018.

Supreme Court Clarifies Order on Municipal Contracts: Ujjain Corporation vs. BVG India Ltd. (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal Due to Procedural Errors: Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan (2018)

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal Due to Procedural Errors: Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Procedural compliance in second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: Surat Singh (Dead) vs. Siri Bhagwan & Ors. Judgment Date: 19 February 2018 Introduction Date of the Judgment:

Supreme Court Remands Second Appeal Due to Procedural Errors: Surat Singh vs. Siri Bhagwan (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment on Appeals: United Biotech vs. Orchid Chemicals (2018)

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment on Appeals: United Biotech vs. Orchid Chemicals (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of a previous judgment. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: United Biotech Private Limited vs. Orchid Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals Limited and Ors. [Judgment Date]: January 17, 2018 Date of the Judgment: January 17, 2018 Citation: M.A. NO.1764 OF 2017 IN CIVIL

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment on Appeals: United Biotech vs. Orchid Chemicals (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Mining Cap in Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Modification of mining production caps. CASE TYPE: Public Interest Litigation (PIL) related to environmental and mining regulation. Case Name: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya & Ors. vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. [Judgment Date]: 14 December 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 14 December 2017 Citation: 2017 INSC 1037 Judges: Ranjan Gogoi, J., Abhay Manohar

Supreme Court Modifies Mining Cap in Karnataka: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Settlement: Bhushan Steel vs. State of U.P. (2017)

Date of the Judgment: October 30, 2017 Citation: (2017) INSC 947 Judges: Justice Kurian Joseph and Justice R. Banumathi Can parties settle a disciplinary matter pending before the Supreme Court? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question in a recent case involving a dispute between Bhushan Steel and the State of Uttar Pradesh. The

Supreme Court Disposes of Disciplinary Proceedings Based on Settlement: Bhushan Steel vs. State of U.P. (2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Disposes of Income Tax Appeal Based on Yokogawa India Ltd. Judgment (27 October 2017)

LEGAL ISSUE: Applicability of the judgment in C.I.T. v. M/s. Yokogawa India Ltd. to similar cases. CASE TYPE: Income Tax Appeal Case Name: The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. M/s. Rangsons Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Judgment Date: 27 October 2017 Introduction Date of the Judgment: 27 October 2017 Citation: Civil Appeal No.17325 of 2017 Judges:

Supreme Court Disposes of Income Tax Appeal Based on Yokogawa India Ltd. Judgment (27 October 2017) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Family Court Decision in Child Custody Case

Can the Supreme Court intervene to expedite a child custody case? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question by directing the Family Court to quickly resolve a pending matter. This case involves a dispute over the custody of a child, with the Supreme Court intervening to ensure a speedy resolution. The bench comprised

Supreme Court Directs Expedited Family Court Decision in Child Custody Case Read Post »

Scroll to Top