Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court directs survey of mining leases in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 267 (14 March 2024)

/ Central Empowered Committee (CEC), Comprehensive Environment Plans for the Mining Impact Zone (CEPMIZ), Environmental Law, Environmental Protection, Implementation of Court Orders, Mining Law, Mining Leases, Monitoring Committee, Production Ceilings, Reclamation and Rehabilitation Plans (R&R Plans), Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court directs survey of mining leases in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 267 (14 March 2024) Date of the Judgment: 14 March 2024 Citation: 2024 INSC 267 Judges: Justice Sanjiv Khanna, Justice M.M. Sundresh, and Justice Bela M. Trivedi Can the Supreme Court intervene to ensure […]

Supreme Court directs survey of mining leases in Karnataka and Andhra Pradesh: Samaj Parivartana Samudaya vs. State of Karnataka (2024) INSC 267 (14 March 2024) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (28 January 2022)

/ Arrears of Pay, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Implementation of Court Orders, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors Can the government delay payments to employees who won a legal battle? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, ensuring that arrears are paid to TV News Correspondents, Assistant News Correspondents, and Assistant News Editors. This case involves the Union of India

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (28 January 2022)

/ Arrears Payment, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Employee Benefits, Implementation of Orders, Judges, Sanjiv Khanna, Service Law, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Implementation of court orders regarding pay arrears for TV News Correspondents. CASE TYPE: Service Law/Contempt. Case Name: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao. Judgment Date: 28 January 2022 Date of the Judgment: 28

Supreme Court Directs Arrears Payment for TV News Correspondents and Editors: Union of India vs. E Krishna Rao (28 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies interim mining permissions in Bihar: State of Bihar vs. Pawan Kumar (2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Environmental Clearances, Environmental Law, Interim Orders, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Mining Law, National Green Tribunal, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court clarifies interim mining permissions in Bihar: State of Bihar vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Clarification on interim arrangements for mining permissions during the pendency of environmental clearances. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Mining Law Case Name: The State of Bihar and Others vs. Pawan Kumar and Others [Judgment Date]: 18 January 2022 Date

Supreme Court clarifies interim mining permissions in Bihar: State of Bihar vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of mining rights in Bihar: State of Bihar vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) INSC 30

/ B.R. Gavai, Environmental Clearances, Environmental Law, Interlocutory Applications, Interpretation of Orders, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, National Green Tribunal, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Clarifies Mining Rights Amidst Environmental Concerns in Bihar Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 30 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao J. and B.R. Gavai J. Can previously successful bidders for mining contracts claim a vested right to continue operations when new environmental regulations are introduced? The Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court clarifies the scope of mining rights in Bihar: State of Bihar vs. Pawan Kumar (2022) INSC 30 Read Post »

Supreme Court Holds Bihar Government in Contempt for Non-Compliance with Pension Orders: Bijay Kumar Sinha vs. Tripurari Sharan (2022) INSC 49 (18 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Contempt of Court, Employee Benefits, Government Employees, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Service Law, Service Law with Pension Benefits, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Holds Bihar Government in Contempt for Non-Compliance with Pension Orders Date of the Judgment: 18 January 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 49 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao J., B.R. Gavai J. Can a state government repeatedly ignore court orders regarding employee benefits? The Supreme Court of India recently addressed this question, initiating contempt proceedings against

Supreme Court Holds Bihar Government in Contempt for Non-Compliance with Pension Orders: Bijay Kumar Sinha vs. Tripurari Sharan (2022) INSC 49 (18 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court Stays Inquiry into Private Conversation in PIL: Justice V. Eswaraiah vs. Union of India (2021)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Civil Procedure, Interlocutory Applications, Judges, Judicial Inquiry, Maintainability of PIL, Principles of Natural Justice, Procedural Fairness, Public Interest Litigation, R. Subhash Reddy, Societies Registration Act, 1860

Supreme Court Stays Inquiry into Private Conversation in PIL: Justice V. Eswaraiah vs. Union of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can order an inquiry into a private conversation in a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) when the conversation is not directly related to the main issue of the PIL. CASE TYPE: Public Interest

Supreme Court Stays Inquiry into Private Conversation in PIL: Justice V. Eswaraiah vs. Union of India (2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Already Challaned Coal in Meghalaya: Lber Laloo vs. All Dimasa Students Union (2019)

/ Ashok Bhushan, Environmental Law, Judges, K.M. Joseph, Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, Mining Law, National Green Tribunal, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Already Challaned Coal in Meghalaya LEGAL ISSUE: Whether transportation of already challaned coal should be permitted despite a ban on coal mining. CASE TYPE: Environmental Law, Mining Law Case Name: Lber Laloo vs. All Dimasa Students Union & Ors. and Ka Hima Nongstoin Land Owners, Coal Traders and Producers Association

Supreme Court Allows Transportation of Already Challaned Coal in Meghalaya: Lber Laloo vs. All Dimasa Students Union (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Restores NGT Case on Land Exchange: Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti vs. Union of India (2019)

/ Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Environmental Law, Hemant Gupta, Implementation of Court Orders, Judges, Judicial Discipline, National Green Tribunal, Orders of Courts, Supreme Court of India

Supreme Court Restores NGT Case on Land Exchange: Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti vs. Union of India (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the National Green Tribunal (NGT) erred in disposing of an Original Application (OA) without considering objections after the Supreme Court had directed that the NGT should not hinder the appellant from pursuing remedies in

Supreme Court Restores NGT Case on Land Exchange: Sarv Jan Kalyan Sewa Samiti vs. Union of India (2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Refund Terms for Super Bazar Revival Bidder: Writers and Publishers Pvt Ltd vs. A K Mishra (2018)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Corporate Law, Corporate Revival, D.Y. Chandrachud, Dipak Misra, Insolvency, Interpretation of Orders, Judges, Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, Provisions of Multi-State Cooperative Societies Act, 2002, Supreme Court Orders

Supreme Court Clarifies Refund Terms for Super Bazar Revival Bidder: Writers and Publishers Pvt Ltd vs. A K Mishra (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of refund terms in a court-monitored revival process. CASE TYPE: Corporate Insolvency/Revival. Case Name: M/S Writers and Publisher Pvt Ltd vs. A K Mishra, Official Liquidator, The Cooperative Stores Ltd. Super Bazar.

Supreme Court Clarifies Refund Terms for Super Bazar Revival Bidder: Writers and Publishers Pvt Ltd vs. A K Mishra (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment on Differential Benefits for Employees: Ashok Kumar vs. State of Jharkhand (2018)

/ Differential Mandatory Benefits, Implementation of Court Orders, J. Chelameswar, Judges, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Service Law, Supreme Court Judgments

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment on Differential Benefits for Employees: Ashok Kumar vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) Date of the Judgment: May 14, 2018 Citation: Civil Appeal No. 877 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.15852 of 2016) Judges: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J. Chelameswar and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul The Supreme Court of India has

Supreme Court Modifies Judgment on Differential Benefits for Employees: Ashok Kumar vs. State of Jharkhand (2018) Read Post »

Supreme Court Clarifies Liquor Ban Proximity to Highways: State of Tamil Nadu vs. K. Balu (23 February 2018)

/ Amitava Roy, Clarification of Judgments, D.Y. Chandrachud, Definition of Municipal Areas, Dipak Misra, Interpretation of Law, Interpretation of Law with Municipal Areas, Judges, Supreme Court Orders, Supreme Court Orders with Order dated 11 July 2017

Supreme Court Clarifies Liquor Ban Proximity to Highways: State of Tamil Nadu vs. K. Balu (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Interpretation of the term “municipal areas” concerning the prohibition of liquor sales near highways. CASE TYPE: Civil Case Name: The State of Tamil Nadu & Ors. vs. K. Balu and Anr. Judgment Date: 23 February 2018 Date

Supreme Court Clarifies Liquor Ban Proximity to Highways: State of Tamil Nadu vs. K. Balu (23 February 2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top