Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022)

/ B.V. Nagarathna, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Judges, M.R. Shah, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Tax Law

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a High Court can entertain a writ petition against an assessment order when a statutory remedy of appeal is available. CASE TYPE: Tax Law Case Name: The State of Maharashtra and Others vs. […]

Supreme Court Upholds Statutory Remedy in Tax Assessment Dispute: State of Maharashtra vs. Greatship (India) Limited (20 September 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows adjustment of protest payments against pre-deposit for appeals under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act: VVF (India) Limited vs. State of Maharashtra (2021) INSC 722 (03 December 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 with Section 26(6A), Pre-deposit for appeals, Tax Assessment

Supreme Court Allows Adjustment of Protest Payments Against Pre-Deposit for Appeals in Maharashtra VAT Act Date of the Judgment: 03 December 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 722 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and A.S. Bopanna, J Can a payment made under protest before an assessment order be considered as part of the mandatory pre-deposit required

Supreme Court allows adjustment of protest payments against pre-deposit for appeals under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act: VVF (India) Limited vs. State of Maharashtra (2021) INSC 722 (03 December 2021) Read Post »

Scroll to Top