Supreme Court allows adjustment of protest payments against pre-deposit for appeals under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act: VVF (India) Limited vs. State of Maharashtra (2021) INSC 722 (03 December 2021)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Constitutional Law, Constitutional Law with Article 226, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Judges, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 with Section 26(6A), Pre-deposit for appeals, Tax Assessment

Supreme Court Allows Adjustment of Protest Payments Against Pre-Deposit for Appeals in Maharashtra VAT Act Date of the Judgment: 03 December 2021 Citation: (2021) INSC 722 Judges: Dr. Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J and A.S. Bopanna, J Can a payment made under protest before an assessment order be considered as part of the mandatory pre-deposit required […]

Supreme Court allows adjustment of protest payments against pre-deposit for appeals under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act: VVF (India) Limited vs. State of Maharashtra (2021) INSC 722 (03 December 2021) Read Post »