Telecom Law

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021)

/ Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR), Civil Appeals, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, M. R. Shah, S. Abdul Nazeer, Supreme Court Judgments, Telecom Law, Telecom Regulatory

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (2021) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether clerical or arithmetical errors in the calculation of Adjusted Gross Revenue (AGR) dues can be rectified despite a previous Supreme Court order prohibiting reassessment. CASE TYPE: Telecom Regulatory/Civil Case Name: Union […]

Supreme Court Clarifies AGR Dues: No Recalculation Allowed, Union of India vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Providers of India (23 July 2021) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Disclosure of Segmented Offers in Telecom Tariff Dispute: TRAI vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (2020) INSC 721 (06 November 2020)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Judges, Regulatory Authority, S.A. Bobde, Telecom Law, Telecom Law with Section 11(1)(b)(i), Telecom Law with Section 11(2), Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI), Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997, V. Ramasubramanian

Supreme Court Orders Disclosure of Segmented Offers in Telecom Tariff Dispute Date of the Judgment: 06 November 2020 Citation: (2020) INSC 721 Judges: S.A. Bobde, CJI, A.S. Bopanna, J., V. Ramasubramanian, J. Can a telecom regulator demand details of segmented offers from service providers to ensure fair pricing? The Supreme Court addressed this question in

Supreme Court Orders Disclosure of Segmented Offers in Telecom Tariff Dispute: TRAI vs. Bharti Airtel Ltd. (2020) INSC 721 (06 November 2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Excess Spectrum Charges: Union of India vs. Reliance Communication Limited (2020)

/ Breach of contract, Contract Law, Execution of Contract, Judges, R.F. Nariman, S. Ravindra Bhat, Spectrum Auction, Telecom Law, Telecom Law with Clause 4.5b(ix) of NIA 2013, Telecom Law with Clause 4.5b(x) of NIA 2015, Unjust Enrichment

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Excess Spectrum Charges: Union of India vs. Reliance Communication Limited (2020) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether the Union of India can withhold excess amounts realized from the encashment of bank guarantees after the licensee has furnished fresh guarantees for the same liability. CASE TYPE: Telecom/Contract Law Case Name: Union of India vs.

Supreme Court Orders Refund of Excess Spectrum Charges: Union of India vs. Reliance Communication Limited (2020) Read Post »

Supreme Court directs review of penalty calculation for unauthorized bandwidth use: Union of India vs. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (2018) INSC 868

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Administrative Law, Judges, Kurian Joseph, Review of Orders, Show Cause Notice, Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT), Telecom Law, Telegraph Rules, Unified Access Services License (UASL)

Supreme Court directs review of penalty calculation for unauthorized bandwidth use: Union of India vs. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (2018) INSC 868 Date of the Judgment: 03 October 2018 Citation: (2018) INSC 868 Judges: Kurian Joseph, J. and A.M. Khanwilkar, J. Can the government levy penalties and interest based on notifications without providing evidence

Supreme Court directs review of penalty calculation for unauthorized bandwidth use: Union of India vs. Tech Mahindra Business Services Ltd. (2018) INSC 868 Read Post »

Scroll to Top