Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

Supreme Court: Prior Approval Mandatory for Recording Offence under TADA Act (Ebha Arjun Jadeja & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat, 2019)

/ Aniruddha Bose, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 with Section 154(1), Deepak Gupta, First Information Report, Judges, TADA Act Offence, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 20-A(1)

Supreme Court: Prior Approval Mandatory for TADA Act Offence Recording Date of the Judgment: October 16, 2019 Citation: (2019) INSC 1148 Judges: Deepak Gupta, J., Aniruddha Bose, J. Can police record information about an offense under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA Act) without prior approval from the District Superintendent of Police? […]

Supreme Court: Prior Approval Mandatory for Recording Offence under TADA Act (Ebha Arjun Jadeja & Ors. vs. State of Gujarat, 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanctions: State of Gujarat vs. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya (27 February 2019)

/ A.M. Khanwilkar, Ajay Rastogi, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 34, Judges, Offences Against the State, Sanction for Prosecution, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 20-A

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanctions: State of Gujarat vs. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya (2019) Date of the Judgment: 27 February 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) stand if the mandatory

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanctions: State of Gujarat vs. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya (27 February 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court clarifies parole eligibility for TADA convicts: Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) INSC 774

/ A.K. Sikri, Ashok Bhushan, Criminal Law, Furlough, Judges, Parole, Parole under TADA, Prisoner Rights, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987

LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) is a sufficient ground to deny parole. CASE TYPE: Criminal Law, Parole. Case Name: Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan and Others. Judgment Date: September 11, 2017. Introduction Can a person convicted under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA)

Supreme Court clarifies parole eligibility for TADA convicts: Asfaq vs. State of Rajasthan (2017) INSC 774 Read Post »

Scroll to Top