Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 20-A Archives

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanctions: State of Gujarat vs. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya (27 February 2019)

Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal in TADA Case Due to Invalid Sanctions: State of Gujarat vs. Anwar Osman Sumbhaniya (2019) Date of the Judgment: 27 February 2019 Citation: [Not Available in Source] Judges: A.M. Khanwilkar, J., Ajay Rastogi, J. Can a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA) stand if the mandatory […]

Supreme Court quashes TADA convictions due to invalid sanctions: Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State (27 April 2017)

April 27, 2017 / Indian Penal Code, 1860, Indian Penal Code, 1860 with Section 302, Judges, Offences Against Human Body, Pinaki Chandra Ghose, Rohinton Fali Nariman, Terrorist Act, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 20-A, Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 with Section 3(1)

Can a conviction under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act (TADA) stand if the mandatory prior approvals were not properly obtained? The Supreme Court of India addressed this critical question in the case of Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State. The court overturned the convictions, emphasizing the importance of strict adherence to legal procedures. This

Supreme Court quashes TADA convictions due to invalid sanctions: Seeni Nainar Mohammed vs. State (27 April 2017) Read Post »