Trademark Infringement

Supreme Court clarifies appealability of interlocutory orders in trademark disputes: Shyam Sel and Power Limited vs. Shyam Steel Industries Limited (2022) INSC 192 (14 March 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XLIII Rule 1, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Section 2(9), Intra-Court Appeals, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Trademark Infringement, Trademark Law

Supreme Court Clarifies Appealability of Interlocutory Orders in Trademark Disputes Date of the Judgment: 14 March 2022 Citation: (2022) INSC 192 Judges: L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.R. Gavai, J. Can every order passed by a single judge of a High Court be challenged in an intra-court appeal? The Supreme Court of India addressed this question […]

Supreme Court clarifies appealability of interlocutory orders in trademark disputes: Shyam Sel and Power Limited vs. Shyam Steel Industries Limited (2022) INSC 192 (14 March 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court settles Trademark Infringement: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. wins against “Sai Renaissance” (19 January 2022)

/ B.R. Gavai, B.V. Nagarathna, Judges, L. Nageswara Rao, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 29, Trade Marks Act, 1999 with Section 30, Trademark Infringement

Supreme Court Upholds Trademark Infringement: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. v. B. Vijaya Sai (2022) Date of the Judgment: 19 January 2022 Citation: 2022 INSC 70 Judges: B.R. Gavai, J., L. Nageswara Rao, J., B.V. Nagarathna, J. (authored by B.R. Gavai, J.) Can a hotel use a name that is substantially similar to a registered trademark,

Supreme Court settles Trademark Infringement: Renaissance Hotel Holdings Inc. wins against “Sai Renaissance” (19 January 2022) Read Post »

Supreme Court overturns contempt order in trademark case: U.C. Surendranath vs. Mambally’s Bakery (22 July 2019)

/ A.S. Bopanna, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 with Order XXXIX Rule 2A, Contempt of Court, Injunction, Judges, Passing Off, R. Banumathi, Trademark Infringement, Trademark Law

Supreme Court overturns contempt order in trademark case: U.C. Surendranath vs. Mambally’s Bakery (2019) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether there was willful disobedience of an interim injunction order warranting punishment under Order XXXIX Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. CASE TYPE: Civil Contempt Case Name: U.C. Surendranath vs. Mambally’s Bakery Judgment Date: 22 July

Supreme Court overturns contempt order in trademark case: U.C. Surendranath vs. Mambally’s Bakery (22 July 2019) Read Post »

Supreme Court allows use of ‘Malabar’ with ‘Baroma’ for Biryani Rice: Parakh Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baroma Agro Product (2018)

/ Class 30, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Descriptive Trademarks, Judges, Passing Off, R. Banumathi, Ranjan Gogoi, Trade Marks Act, 1999, Trademark Infringement, Trademark Law

Supreme Court Allows Use of ‘Malabar’ with ‘Baroma’ for Biryani Rice: Parakh Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baroma Agro Product (2018) LEGAL ISSUE: Whether a party can claim exclusive rights over a descriptive word like ‘MALABAR’ in the sale of Biryani Rice. CASE TYPE: Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Case Name: Parakh Vanijya Private Limited vs.

Supreme Court allows use of ‘Malabar’ with ‘Baroma’ for Biryani Rice: Parakh Vanijya Pvt. Ltd. vs. Baroma Agro Product (2018) Read Post »

Scroll to Top